The Syntax of Ellipsis: Evidence from Dutch Dialects

Jeroen Van Craenenbroeck

228 citations0/0 files stored

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation Phonetics and Phonology Research Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition

Abstract

1. Introduction PART 1 First Case Study: Stranding under Sluicing as PF-Deletion 2. Introduction: Stranding under Sluicing 3. The Data 4. Theoretical Background: Splitting up CP 5. The Analysis 6. When Swiping Met Spading: The Case of Frisian 7. Previous Analyses 8. Expanding the Data Set 9. Conclusion and Theoretical Implications PART 2 Second Case Study: Short Do Replies as TP-Proforms 10. Short Do Replies: Introduction 11. The Data 12. Theoretical Background 13. The Analysis 14. Spelling out the Proform: Da's Nie and Da's Wel 15. Conjugated 'Yes' and 'No' in SDR-Dialects 16. Conclusion and Theoretical Implications General Conclusions Notes References

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 228 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2014Contrast and Island Sensitivity in Clausal Ellipsis 2018The Oxford Handbook of Ellipsis 2014Gender mismatches under nominal ellipsis 2017Stripping and Topless Complements 2016Alternative Semantics 2011VP ellipsis, phases and the syntax of morphology 2014Being progressive is just a phase: celebrating the uniqueness of progressive aspect under a phase-based analysis 2013Polarity Items under Ellipsis

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.