SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Methodological Quality of Open Access Compared to Traditional Journal Publications in the Plastic Surgery Literature
13 references·0 citing·44 second hop
Methodological Quality of Open Access Compared to Traditional Journal Publications in the Plastic Surgery Literature (2023)Methodological Quality of Open Access Com…Impact of Conventional and Open Access Publications in Orthopaedic Surgery (2021)Impact of Conventional and Op…Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports (2018)Methodological quality and sy…Measuring the Impact of Gold and Green Open Access (2017)Measuring the Impact of Gold …AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisa…An Update on the Level of Evidence for Plastic Surgery Research Published in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (2016)An Update on the Level of Evi…Submission Bias and the Rise of Open Access Journals (2015)Submission Bias and the Rise …Article processing charges in OA journals: relationship between price and quality (2015)Article processing charges in…Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure (2012)Anatomy of open access publis…A study of open access journals using article processing charges (2012)A study of open access journa…The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)The Development of Open Acces…The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's …Authors and open access publishing (2004)Authors and open access publi…Methodological index for non‐randomized studies ( MINORS ): development and validation of a new instrument (2003)Methodological index for non‐…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015)Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals (2010)Making Open Access work (2015)Drivers and Implications of Scientific Open Access Publishing (2016)Predatory and exploitative behaviour in academic publishing: An assessment (2019)Open Access (2012)Anatomy of green open access (2013)Emerging trends in peer review—a survey (2015)Diffusion of Innovations 1 (2019)On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective (2019)Comparing the Impact of Open Access (OA) vs. Non-OA Articles in the Same Journals (2004)Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009 (2010)Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research (2010)Green and gold open access citation and interdisciplinary advantage: A bibliometric study of two science journals (2019)Is open access publication useful for all research fields? Presence of funding, collaboration and impact (2020)Understanding the increasing market share of the academic publisher “Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute” in the publication output of Central and Eastern European countries: a case study of Hungary (2022)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)In Defense of Case Reports and Case Series (2001)Meta-analysis of prevalence (2013)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)Methodological quality of case series studies (2019)Conducting proportional meta-analysis in different types of systematic reviews: a guide for synthesisers of evidence (2021)Methodological quality of COVID-19 clinical research (2021)The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access (2004)Open access self-archiving: An author study (2005)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond (2019)Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,776 cited
  • 2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both10,605 cited
  • 2003Methodological index for non‐randomized studies ( MINORS ): development and validation of a new instrument7,590 cited
  • 2018Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports2,235 cited
  • 2011The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009753 cited
  • 2012Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure364 cited
  • 2012A study of open access journals using article processing charges358 cited
  • 2004Authors and open access publishing219 cited
  • 2015Article processing charges in OA journals: relationship between price and quality119 cited
  • 2017Measuring the Impact of Gold and Green Open Access66 cited
  • 2016An Update on the Level of Evidence for Plastic Surgery Research Published in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery39 cited
  • 2021Impact of Conventional and Open Access Publications in Orthopaedic Surgery12 cited
  • 2015Submission Bias and the Rise of Open Access Journals11 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work