SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Rising quantitative productivity and shifting readership in academic publishing: Bibliometric insights from monkeypox literature
16 references·0 citing·49 second hop
Rising quantitative productivity and shifting readership in academic publishing: Bibliometric insights from monkeypox literature (2023)Rising quantitative productivity and shif…Bibliometric analysis of global research trends on monkeypox: Are we ready to face this challenge? (2022)Bibliometric analysis of glob…The rapid, massive growth of COVID-19 authors in the scientific literature (2021)The rapid, massive growth of …Open is not forever: A study of vanished open access journals (2021)Open is not forever: A study …Waste in covid-19 research (2020)Waste in covid-19 researchThe carnage of substandard research during the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for quality (2020)The carnage of substandard re…How a torrent of COVID science changed research publishing — in seven charts (2020)How a torrent of COVID scienc…Citations are a good way to determine the quality of research (2020)Citations are a good way to d…The chaperone effect in scientific publishing (2018)The chaperone effect in scien…The science that’s never been cited (2017)The science that’s never been…The pressure to publish pushes down quality (2016)The pressure to publish pushe…Excellence by Nonsense: The Competition for Publications in Modern Science (2013)Excellence by Nonsense: The C…What do the scientists think about the impact factor? (2012)What do the scientists think …PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus or Google Scholar – Which is the best search engine for an effective literature research in laser medicine? (2011)PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus…The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900–2007 (2009)The decline in the concentrat…The rise and rise of citation analysis (2007)The rise and rise of citation…Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus,…An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index (2010)Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries (2011)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)The Impact Factor Game (2006)Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science (2006)Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools (2011)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)Publishing by—and for?—the Numbers (1990)Continuity and Change in the Social Stratification of Aging and Health Over the Life Course: Evidence From a Nationally Representative Longitudinal Study From 1986 to 2001/2002 (Americans' Changing Lives Study) (2005)Problems of citation analysis: A study of uncited and seldom‐cited influences (2009)The Impact Factor Fallacy (2018)Comparison of the share of documents and citations from different quartile journals in 25 research areas (2019)Do open access journal articles experience a citation advantage? Results and methodological reflections of an application of multiple measures to an analysis by WoS subject areas (2020)Social Stratification in Science (1974)Reconceptualizing Mentoring at Work: A Developmental Network Perspective (2001)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Early coauthorship with top scientists predicts success in academic careers (2019)Mentorship and protégé success in STEM fields (2020)Artificial intelligence tools expand scientists’ impact but contract science’s focus (2026)Little Science, Big Science (1963)A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes (1976)Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research (2010)The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers' citations in the digital age (2012)Misinformation in and about science (2021)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Scientific Publications During the COVID-19 Pandemic (2020)The mental health impact of the covid-19 pandemic on healthcare workers, and interventions to help them: A rapid systematic review (2020)Implicit bias in healthcare: clinical practice, research and decision making (2021)Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)Happiness and Productivity (2015)How swamped preprint servers are blocking bad coronavirus research (2020)4 Migration Research and Analysis: Recent United Nations Contributions (2022)Responsible Conduct of Research (2022)Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals (2020)International collaboration during the COVID-19 crisis: autumn 2020 developments (2021)Publication patterns’ changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal and short-term scientometric analysis (2021)Survey Fatigue During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Analysis of Neurosurgery Survey Response Rates (2021)Mental disorders following COVID-19 and other epidemics: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2022)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation—Review of the Literature (2017)Humanitarian Drones: A Review and Research Agenda (2021)Green finance for green buildings: A systematic review and conceptual foundation (2022)Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)Publish (in English) or perish: The effect on citation rate of using languages other than English in scientific publications (2016)The natural selection of bad science (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses5,591 cited
  • 2020How a torrent of COVID science changed research publishing — in seven charts409 cited
  • 2007The rise and rise of citation analysis382 cited
  • 2020Waste in covid-19 research334 cited
  • 2016The pressure to publish pushes down quality204 cited
  • 2011PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus or Google Scholar – Which is the best search engine for an effective literature research in laser medicine?191 cited
  • 2020The carnage of substandard research during the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for quality177 cited
  • 2009The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900–2007177 cited
  • 2018The chaperone effect in scientific publishing129 cited
  • 2017The science that’s never been cited123 cited
  • 2012What do the scientists think about the impact factor?114 cited
  • 2021The rapid, massive growth of COVID-19 authors in the scientific literature107 cited
  • 2021Open is not forever: A study of vanished open access journals64 cited
  • 2022Bibliometric analysis of global research trends on monkeypox: Are we ready to face this challenge?61 cited
  • 2013Excellence by Nonsense: The Competition for Publications in Modern Science

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

45 cited
  • 2020Citations are a good way to determine the quality of research37 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.