SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Definition, harms, and prevention of redundant systematic reviews
16 references·2 citing·40 second hop
Definition, harms, and prevention of redundant systematic reviews (2023)Definition, harms, and prevention of redu…Where to prospectively register a systematic review (2022)Where to prospectively regist…The score after 10 years of registration of systematic review protocols (2022)The score after 10 years of r…The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…When to replicate systematic reviews of interventions: consensus checklist (2020)When to replicate systematic …The methodological quality of systematic reviews on the treatment of adult major depression needs improvement according to AMSTAR 2: A cross-sectional study (2020)The methodological quality of…Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 1: What Evidence-Based Research is and why is it important? (2020)Evidence-Based Research Serie…Definition of a systematic review used in overviews of systematic reviews, meta-epidemiological studies and textbooks (2019)Definition of a systematic re…AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisa…The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)The Mass Production of Redund…ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)ROBIS: A new tool to assess r…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Preferred reporting items for…Evaluation by Citation: Trends in Publication Behavior, Evaluation Criteria, and the Strive for High Impact Publications (2015)Evaluation by Citation: Trend…The problem of duplicate systematic reviews (2013)The problem of duplicate syst…Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2004)Clinical trial registration: …A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews. (1997)A guide to interpreting disco…Comparative analysis of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews over three decades (2024)Comparative analysis of Cochr…Reviews and Reviewing: Approaches to Research Synthesis. An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper (2023)Reviews and Reviewing: Approa…The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)Improving the Quality of Reports of Meta-Analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials: The QUOROM Statement (2000)Overlapping meta-analyses on the same topic: survey of published studies (2013)Managing overlap of primary study results across systematic reviews: practical considerations for authors of overviews of reviews (2021)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)A tutorial on methodological studies: the what, when, how and why (2020)Development, testing and use of data extraction forms in systematic reviews: a review of methodological guidance (2020)Elements of a quality pre-service teacher mentor: A literature review (2020)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Implementing the 27 PRISMA 2020 Statement items for systematic reviews in the sport and exercise medicine, musculoskeletal rehabilitation and sports science fields: the PERSiST (implementing Prisma in Exercise, Rehabilitation, Sport medicine and SporTs science) guidance (2021)The use of digital technology for social wellbeing reduces social isolation in older adults: A systematic review (2021)How to conduct systematic literature reviews in management research: a guide in 6 steps and 14 decisions (2023)The preregistration revolution (2018)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)A bibliometric analysis of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in ophthalmology (2023)Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews (2023)Steps in undertaking meta-analysis and addressing heterogeneity in meta-analysis (2023)Principles for international registration of protocol information and results from human trials of health related interventions: Ottawa statement (part 1) (2005)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (Chinese version) (2010)Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials (2011)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews107,380 cited
  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation13,108 cited
  • 2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both10,605 cited
  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews4,227 cited
  • 2015ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed2,266 cited
  • 2016The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses1,481 cited
  • 2004Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors408 cited
  • 1997A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews.394 cited
  • 2019Definition of a systematic review used in overviews of systematic reviews, meta-epidemiological studies and textbooks241 cited
  • 2022Where to prospectively register a systematic review193 cited
  • 2020Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 1: What Evidence-Based Research is and why is it important?146 cited
  • 2020When to replicate systematic reviews of interventions: consensus checklist109 cited
  • 2015Evaluation by Citation: Trends in Publication Behavior, Evaluation Criteria, and the Strive for High Impact Publications107 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2013The problem of duplicate systematic reviews99 cited
  • 2020The methodological quality of systematic reviews on the treatment of adult major depression needs improvement according to AMSTAR 2: A cross-sectional study73 cited
  • 2022The score after 10 years of registration of systematic review protocols63 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024Comparative analysis of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews over three decades19 cited
    • 2023Reviews and Reviewing: Approaches to Research Synthesis. An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper18 cited