SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Ethically Driven and Methodologically Tailored: Setting the Agenda for Systematic Reviews in Domestic Violence and Abuse
16 references·0 citing·51 second hopsampled
Ethically Driven and Methodologically Tailored: Setting the Agenda for Systematic Reviews in Domestic Violence and Abuse (2023)Ethically Driven and Methodologically Tai…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline (2020)Synthesis without meta-analys…Guidance for producing a Campbell evidence and gap map (2020)Guidance for producing a Camp…Systematic Reviews in Educational Research (2019)Systematic Reviews in Educati…What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)What kind of systematic revie…An introduction to systematic reviews (2nd Edition) (2017)An introduction to systematic…The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)The academic, economic and so…Evidence & Gap Maps: A tool for promoting evidence informed policy and strategic research agendas (2016)Evidence & Gap Maps: A tool f…Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit (2015)Beyond authorship: attributio…Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits (2013)Searching for grey literature…RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews (2013)RAMESES publication standards…Now I see it, now I don’t: researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research (2013)Now I see it, now I don’t: re…Applying an equity lens to interventions: using PROGRESS ensures consideration of socially stratifying factors to illuminate inequities in health (2013)Applying an equity lens to in…A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)A typology of reviews: an ana…Interventions for Violence Against Women (2003)Interventions for Violence Ag…Bearing witness: ethics in domestic violence research (2002)Bearing witness: ethics in do…Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? (2000)Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions (2007)Gray literature: An important resource in systematic reviews (2017)Environmental education outcomes for conservation: A systematic review (2019)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)When Authorship Fails (1997)What's in a Surname? The Effects of Surname Initials on Academic Success (2006)Publishing: Credit where credit is due (2014)Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication (2018)How can we ensure visibility and diversity in research contributions? How the Contributor Role Taxonomy (CRediT) is helping the shift from authorship to contributorship (2019)The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Writing narrative style literature reviews (2015)Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods (1986)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Health inequalities among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study (1991)Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care (2003)Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health (2008)Environmental, health, wellbeing, social and equity effects of urban green space interventions: A meta-narrative evidence synthesis (2019)The Handbook of Behavior Change (2020)Strengthening systematic reviews in public health: guidance in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2nd edition (2022)Ethnography: Principles and Practice (1983)Qualitative Researching (1997)Handbook of qualitative research (1999)A Guide to Field Notes for Qualitative Research: Context and Conversation (2017)Reflexivity in Qualitative Research (2019)Qualitative Data Analysis (2024)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)Academic engagement: A review of the literature 2011-2019 (2020)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis (2022)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews119,202 cited
  • 2009A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies11,662 cited
  • 2020Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline4,846 cited
  • 2013Now I see it, now I don’t: researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research4,282 cited
  • 2013Applying an equity lens to interventions: using PROGRESS ensures consideration of socially stratifying factors to illuminate inequities in health1,731 cited
  • 2018What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences1,208 cited
  • 2013Searching for grey literature for systematic reviews: challenges and benefits829 cited
  • 2015Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit754 cited
  • 2016The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review629 cited
  • 2013RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews625 cited
  • 2019Systematic Reviews in Educational Research572 cited
  • 2003Interventions for Violence Against Women516 cited
  • 2016Evidence & Gap Maps: A tool for promoting evidence informed policy and strategic research agendas338 cited
  • 2020Guidance for producing a Campbell evidence and gap map

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

263 cited
  • 2002Bearing witness: ethics in domestic violence research234 cited
  • 2017An introduction to systematic reviews (2nd Edition)210 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.