SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Internal consistency and structural validity of the nomophobia questionnaire (NMP-Q) and its translations: A systematic review with meta-analysis
16 references·1 citing·50 second hop
Internal consistency and structural validity of the nomophobia questionnaire (NMP-Q) and its translations: A systematic review with meta-analysis (2023)Internal consistency and structural valid…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…The Emerging Phenomenon of Nomophobia in Young Adults: A Systematic Review Study. (2021)The Emerging Phenomenon of No…A systematic review on nomophobia prevalence: Surfacing results and standard guidelines for future research (2021)A systematic review on nomoph…Risk‐of‐bias VISualization (robvis): An R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk‐of‐bias assessments (2020)Risk‐of‐bias VISualization (r…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument (2016)The COnsensus-based Standards…Plea for routinely presenting prediction intervals in meta-analysis (2016)Plea for routinely presenting…Misunderstandings about Q and ‘Cochran's Q test' in meta‐analysis (2015)Misunderstandings about Q and…Faster title and abstract screening? Evaluating Abstrackr, a semi-automated online screening program for systematic reviewers (2015)Faster title and abstract scr…Exploring the dimensions of nomophobia: Development and validation of a self-reported questionnaire (2015)Exploring the dimensions of n…Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Estimating the reproducibilit…Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis (2010)Outlier and influence diagnos…Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R…How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? (2002)How should meta‐regression an…Reliability Generalization: Exploring Variance in Measurement Error Affecting Score Reliability Across Studies (1998)Reliability Generalization: E…Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests (1951)Coefficient Alpha and the Int…The Relationship between Nomophobia, Insomnia, Chronotype, Phone in Proximity, Screen Time, and Sleep Duration in Adults: A Mobile Phone App-Assisted Cross-Sectional Study (2023)The Relationship between Nomo…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)Estimating Psychological Networks and their Accuracy: A Tutorial Paper (2016)Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper (2017)Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2007)Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (2013)A growing fear (2015)Prevalence of problematic smartphone usage and associated mental health outcomes amongst children and young people: a systematic review, meta-analysis and GRADE of the evidence (2019)Antecedents and consequences of problematic smartphone use: A systematic literature review of an emerging research area (2020)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Mind-sets matter: A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. (2012)Psychological correlates of university students' academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2012)Annual Research Review: A meta‐analysis of the worldwide prevalence of mental disorders in children and adolescents (2015)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial (2019)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Book Reviews: Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis Larry V. Hedges and Ingram Olkin New York: Academic Press, 1985. xxii + 369 pp (1988)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The Theory of the Estimation of Test Reliability (1937)Measurement and prediction (1950)Theory of Mental Tests (1950)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research (1989)The theory of planned behavior (1991)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Socioeconomic status and the 25 × 25 risk factors as determinants of premature mortality: a multicohort study and meta-analysis of 1·7 million men and women (2017)Long-term outcomes of childhood sexual abuse: an umbrella review (2019)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)Improving sleep quality leads to better mental health: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)How to properly use the PRISMA Statement (2021)Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement (2021)CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies (2013)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)An introduction to systematic reviews (2nd Edition) (2017)Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1951Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests45,148 cited
  • 2010Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package20,490 cited
  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews14,564 cited
  • 2015Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science8,516 cited
  • 2020Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions5,812 cited
  • 2020Risk‐of‐bias VISualization (robvis): An R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk‐of‐bias assessments5,714 cited
  • 2002How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?3,021 cited
  • 2010Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis2,932 cited
  • 2016Plea for routinely presenting prediction intervals in meta-analysis2,307 cited
  • 2015Exploring the dimensions of nomophobia: Development and validation of a self-reported questionnaire1,343 cited
  • 2016The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument967 cited
  • 1998Reliability Generalization: Exploring Variance in Measurement Error Affecting Score Reliability Across Studies470 cited
  • 2015Misunderstandings about Q and ‘Cochran's Q test' in meta‐analysis321 cited
  • 2015Faster title and abstract screening? Evaluating Abstrackr, a semi-automated online screening program for systematic reviewers

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

196 cited
  • 2021A systematic review on nomophobia prevalence: Surfacing results and standard guidelines for future research139 cited
  • 2021The Emerging Phenomenon of Nomophobia in Young Adults: A Systematic Review Study.136 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2023The Relationship between Nomophobia, Insomnia, Chronotype, Phone in Proximity, Screen Time, and Sleep Duration in Adults: A Mobile Phone App-Assisted Cross-Sectional Study31 cited