SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reporting Standards for Diagnostic Testing
3 references·0 citing·12 second hop
Reporting Standards for Diagnostic Testing (2023)Reporting Standards for Diagnostic TestingDetermining qualitative effect size ratings using a likelihood ratio scatter matrix in diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews (2018)Determining qualitative effec…STARD 2015: updated reporting guidelines for all diagnostic accuracy studies. (2016)STARD 2015: updated reporting…STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration (2016)STARD 2015 guidelines for rep…Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2015)Manuscript Development and Publishing: A 5-Step Approach (2016)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)Development and validation of a risk-of-bias tool for assessing in vitro studies conducted in dentistry: The QUIN (2022)Heuristic Decision Making (2010)Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. (2011)Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-analysis: A Practical Guide to Hierarchical Models (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2016STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration2,564 cited
  • 2016STARD 2015: updated reporting guidelines for all diagnostic accuracy studies.85 cited
  • 2018Determining qualitative effect size ratings using a likelihood ratio scatter matrix in diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews27 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work