SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
How to Conduct a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: A Guide for Clinicians
16 references·2 citing·34 second hop
How to Conduct a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: A Guide for Clinicians (2023)How to Conduct a Systematic Review and Me…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Updated methodological guidan…RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)RoB 2: a revised tool for ass…A step by step guide for conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis with simulation data (2019)A step by step guide for cond…Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)Time to challenge the spuriou…Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Systematic review or scoping …PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)PRISMA Extension for Scoping …A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches (2018)A systematic approach to sear…The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)The Mass Production of Redund…ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessin…De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote (2016)De-duplication of database se…Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews (2015)Guidance for conducting syste…The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews (2012)The nuts and bolts of PROSPER…A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)A typology of reviews: an ana…Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…How to Write the Methods Section of a Research Manuscript (2023)How to Write the Methods Sect…An Overview of How to Search and Write a Medical Literature Review (2023)An Overview of How to Search …Oxford English dictionary (2004)The Oxford English Dictionary Online (2004)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews (2022)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)Convergent and sequential synthesis designs: implications for conducting and reporting systematic reviews of qualitative and quantitative evidence (2017)Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies (2018)Loneliness before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review with meta-analysis. (2022)Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application (2021)Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews107,380 cited
  • 2018PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation43,318 cited
  • 2019RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,067 cited
  • 2016ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions20,225 cited
  • 2018Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach11,351 cited
  • 2009A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies10,781 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
  • 2020Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews7,715 cited
  • 2015Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews7,457 cited
  • 2016De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote1,926 cited
  • 2016The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses1,481 cited
  • 2012The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews1,430 cited
  • 2018Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews?1,254 cited
  • 2007Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

891 cited
  • 2018A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches861 cited
  • 2019A step by step guide for conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis with simulation data813 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2023How to Write the Methods Section of a Research Manuscript14 cited
    • 2023An Overview of How to Search and Write a Medical Literature Review12 cited