SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on team considerations, study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment
16 references·11 citing·30 second hop
Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on team considerations, study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment (2023)Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on…Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation (2020)Software tools to support tit…Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews (2020)Cochrane Rapid Reviews Method…The Accuracy of Google Translate for Abstracting Data From Non–English-Language Trials for Systematic Reviews (2019)The Accuracy of Google Transl…Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review (2019)Single screening versus conve…RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)RoB 2: a revised tool for ass…PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the…AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisa…ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessin…Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Rayyan—a web and mobile app f…ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)ROBIS: A new tool to assess r…A scoping review of rapid review methods (2015)A scoping review of rapid rev…Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic (2012)Interrater reliability: the k…QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for …Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews (2006)Single data extraction genera…Identification of randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews: accuracy and reliability of screening records (2002)Identification of randomized …A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)A Coefficient of Agreement fo…Responsible Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Rapid Reviews: A Position Statement From the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group (2025)Responsible Integration of Ar…Rapid reviews methods series: guidance on rapid scoping, mapping and evidence and gap map (‘Big Picture Reviews’) (2025)Rapid reviews methods series:…Exploring the potential of Claude 2 for risk of bias assessment: Using a large language model to assess randomized controlled trials with RoB 2 (2025)Exploring the potential of Cl…Rapid reviews methods series: guidance on rapid qualitative evidence synthesis (2024)Rapid reviews methods series:…Rapid reviews methods series: assessing the appropriateness of conducting a rapid review (2024)Rapid reviews methods series:…Rapid review method series: interim guidance for the reporting of rapid reviews (2024)Rapid review method series: i…Key concepts in rapid reviews: an overview (2024)Key concepts in rapid reviews…Frequency of use and adequacy of Cochrane risk of bias tool 2 in non‐Cochrane systematic reviews published in 2020: Meta‐research study (2024)Frequency of use and adequacy…Rapid Reviews Methods Series: Involving patient and public partners, healthcare providers and policymakers as knowledge users (2023)Rapid Reviews Methods Series:…Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on literature search (2023)Rapid reviews methods series:…Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on assessing the certainty of evidence (2023)Rapid reviews methods series:…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)Rapid Systematic Review: The Impact of Social Isolation and Loneliness on the Mental Health of Children and Adolescents in the Context of COVID-19 (2020)Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application (2021)Analysing and Presenting Results (2010)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review (2019)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review (2021)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2010)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration (2018)Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020)PROBAST+AI: an updated quality, risk of bias, and applicability assessment tool for prediction models using regression or artificial intelligence methods (2025)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data (1997)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Game-based Learning and 21st century skills: A review of recent research (2016)Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines (2020)Student Motivation and Associated Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis From Self-Determination Theory (2021)Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1960A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales42,335 cited
  • 2019RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,067 cited
  • 2016Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews25,980 cited
  • 2016ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions20,225 cited
  • 2012Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic19,799 cited
  • 2011QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies14,163 cited
  • 2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both10,605 cited
  • 2018PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies2,953 cited
  • 2015ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed2,266 cited
  • 2015A scoping review of rapid review methods1,145 cited
  • 2020Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews1,141 cited
  • 2019Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review625 cited
  • 2006Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews462 cited
  • 2020Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

448 cited
  • 2002Identification of randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews: accuracy and reliability of screening records340 cited
  • 2019The Accuracy of Google Translate for Abstracting Data From Non–English-Language Trials for Systematic Reviews291 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2023Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on literature search88 cited
    • 2024Rapid review method series: interim guidance for the reporting of rapid reviews81 cited
    • 2023Rapid Reviews Methods Series: Involving patient and public partners, healthcare providers and policymakers as knowledge users47 cited
    • 2024Key concepts in rapid reviews: an overview37 cited
    • 2023Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on assessing the certainty of evidence37 cited
    • 2024Frequency of use and adequacy of Cochrane risk of bias tool 2 in non‐Cochrane systematic reviews published in 2020: Meta‐research study35 cited
    • 2024Rapid reviews methods series: guidance on rapid qualitative evidence synthesis28 cited
    • 2024Rapid reviews methods series: assessing the appropriateness of conducting a rapid review26 cited
    • 2025Rapid reviews methods series: guidance on rapid scoping, mapping and evidence and gap map (‘Big Picture Reviews’)23 cited
    • 2025Exploring the potential of Claude 2 for risk of bias assessment: Using a large language model to assess randomized controlled trials with RoB 221 cited
    • 2025Responsible Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Rapid Reviews: A Position Statement From the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group11 cited