SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The relationship of publication language, study population, risk of bias, and treatment effects in acupuncture related systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiologic study
11 references·0 citing·39 second hop
The relationship of publication language, study population, risk of bias, and treatment effects in acupuncture related systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiologic study (2023)The relationship of publication language,…Risk of bias assessments and reporting quality of systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials examining acupuncture for depression: An overview and meta‐epidemiology study (2020)Risk of bias assessments and …Interventions for improving sleep quality in people with chronic kidney disease (2019)Interventions for improving s…A bibliometric analysis of acupuncture research trends in Acupuncture in Medicine (2019)A bibliometric analysis of ac…Interpretation of subgroup analyses in systematic reviews: A tutorial (2018)Interpretation of subgroup an…Association Between Publication Characteristics and Treatment Effect Estimates (2018)Association Between Publicati…Association Between Risk-of-Bias Assessments and Results of Randomized Trials in Cochrane Reviews: The ROBES Meta-Epidemiologic Study (2017)Association Between Risk-of-B…Publication Trends in Acupuncture Research: A 20-Year Bibliometric Analysis Based on PubMed (2016)Publication Trends in Acupunc…Heterogeneity in Search Strategies among Cochrane Acupuncture Reviews: Is There Room for Improvement? (2010)Heterogeneity in Search Strat…Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses (2001)Reported Methodologic Quality…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. D…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of BiasHealth Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Chapter 9: Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-Analyses (2008)Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses (2019)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): Extending the CONSORT Statement (2010)Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) research: A bibliometric analysis of publication trends over the first 20 years (2020)Insight into the characteristics of research published in traditional, complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine journals: a bibliometric analysis (2021)Ayurveda research: Emerging trends and mapping to sustainable development goals (2023)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Research Review: The effects of mindfulness‐based interventions on cognition and mental health in children and adolescents – a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials (2018)Efficacy of cognitive bias modification interventions in anxiety and depressive disorders: a systematic review and network meta-analysis (2020)Impact of blinding on estimated treatment effects in randomised clinical trials: meta-epidemiological study (2020)Quality of sleep and health-related quality of life in haemodialysis patients (2002)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Bidirectional associations between sleep quality/duration and multimorbidity in middle-aged and older people Chinese adults: a longitudinal study (2024)Statistical heterogeneity in systematic reviews of clinical trials: a critical appraisal of guidelines and practice (2002)The prevalence of depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbances in COVID‐19 patients: a meta‐analysis (2020)The prevalence of depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms and sleep disturbance in higher education students during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2021)The prevalence of loneliness across 113 countries: systematic review and meta-analysis (2022)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Influence of Reported Study Design Characteristics on Intervention Effect Estimates From Randomized, Controlled Trials (2012)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review (2013)Association Between Lack of Blinding and Mortality Results in Critical Care Randomized Controlled Trials: A Meta-Epidemiological Study* (2021)Including non‐English language articles in systematic reviews: A reflection on processes for identifying low‐cost sources of translation support (2021)An exploration of available methods and tools to improve the efficiency of systematic review production: a scoping review (2024)Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping (2009)Knowledge Mapping Analysis of International Research on Acupuncture for Low Back Pain Using Bibliometrics (2021)No health without mental health (2007)ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)Reporting and methodological quality of acupuncture network meta-analyses could be improved: an evidence mapping (2022)Reporting quality of meta-analyses in acupuncture: Investigating adherence to the PRISMA statement (2024)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
  • 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
  • 2001Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses2,285 cited
  • 2018Interpretation of subgroup analyses in systematic reviews: A tutorial561 cited
  • 2017Association Between Risk-of-Bias Assessments and Results of Randomized Trials in Cochrane Reviews: The ROBES Meta-Epidemiologic Study381 cited
  • 2016Publication Trends in Acupuncture Research: A 20-Year Bibliometric Analysis Based on PubMed177 cited
  • 2019Interventions for improving sleep quality in people with chronic kidney disease76 cited
  • 2018Association Between Publication Characteristics and Treatment Effect Estimates60 cited
  • 2020Risk of bias assessments and reporting quality of systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials examining acupuncture for depression: An overview and meta‐epidemiology study31 cited
  • 2019A bibliometric analysis of acupuncture research trends in Acupuncture in Medicine21 cited
  • 2010Heterogeneity in Search Strategies among Cochrane Acupuncture Reviews: Is There Room for Improvement?15 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work