SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
In‐depth analysis of patterns in selection of different physiologically‐based pharmacokinetic modeling tools: Part II — Assessment of model reusability and comparison between open and non‐open source‐code software
7 references·1 citing·31 second hop
In‐depth analysis of patterns in selection of different physiologically‐based pharmacokinetic modeling tools: Part II — Assessment of model reusability and comparison between open and non‐open source‐code software (2023)In‐depth analysis of patterns in selectio…Reproducibility in systems biology modelling (2021)Reproducibility in systems bi…Reproducibility of Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Models: Current Challenges and Future Opportunities (2019)Reproducibility of Quantitati…Reproducibility and Replicability in Science (2019)Reproducibility and Replicabi…Replicability or reproducibility? On the replication crisis in computational neuroscience and sharing only relevant detail (2018)Replicability or reproducibil…A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches (2018)A systematic approach to sear…Reproducibility and Comparability of Computational Models for Astrocyte Calcium Excitability (2017)Reproducibility and Comparabi…1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)1,500 scientists lift the lid…In‐Depth Analysis of the Selection of PBPK Modeling Tools: Bibliometric and Social Network Analysis of the Open Systems Pharmacology Community (2024)In‐Depth Analysis of the Sele…The CellML Model Repository (2008)Minimum Information About a Simulation Experiment (MIASE) (2011)Reproducible computational biology experiments with SED-ML - The Simulation Experiment Description Markup Language (2011)Challenges in Reproducibility, Replicability, and Comparability of Computational Models and Tools for Neuronal and Glial Networks, Cells, and Subcellular Structures (2018)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)An automated approach to identifying search terms for systematic reviews using keyword co‐occurrence networks (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures version 2.0 (2024)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Facets of trust in simulation studies (2020)Keeping modelling notebooks with TRACE: Good for you and good for environmental research and management support (2020)On code sharing and model documentation of published individual and agent-based models (2020)Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? (2011)Ten Simple Rules for Reproducible Computational Research (2013)Model Integration in Computational Biology: The Role of Reproducibility, Credibility and Utility (2022)What does research reproducibility mean? (2016)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)To Sobol or not to Sobol? The effects of sampling schemes in systems biology applications (2021)BioUML—towards a universal research platform (2022)Combining hypothesis- and data-driven neuroscience modeling in FAIR workflows (2022)A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation (1994)The Geography of Transport Systems (2020)Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences (2018)The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines (2020)Challenges for assessing replicability in preclinical cancer biology (2021)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 20161,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility4,200 cited
  • 2019Reproducibility and Replicability in Science921 cited
  • 2018A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches861 cited
  • 2021Reproducibility in systems biology modelling131 cited
  • 2018Replicability or reproducibility? On the replication crisis in computational neuroscience and sharing only relevant detail112 cited
  • 2019Reproducibility of Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Models: Current Challenges and Future Opportunities46 cited
  • 2017Reproducibility and Comparability of Computational Models for Astrocyte Calcium Excitability40 cited

Cited by

  • 2024In‐Depth Analysis of the Selection of PBPK Modeling Tools: Bibliometric and Social Network Analysis of the Open Systems Pharmacology Community10 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work