SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Assessment of retracted papers, and their retraction notices, from a cancer journal associated with “paper mills”
16 references·0 citing·48 second hop
Assessment of retracted papers, and their retraction notices, from a cancer journal associated with “paper mills” (2023)Assessment of retracted papers, and their…Non‐author entities accountable for retractions: A diachronic and cross‐disciplinary exploration of reasons for retraction (2022)Non‐author entities accountab…Issues and Challenges to Reproducibility of Cancer Research: A Commentary (2022)Issues and Challenges to Repr…Inappropriate Citation of Retracted Articles in Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Publications (2022)Inappropriate Citation of Ret…The fight against fake-paper factories that churn out sham science (2021)The fight against fake-paper …Team size and retracted citations reveal the patterns of retractions from 1981 to 2020 (2021)Team size and retracted citat…Retractions, Fake Peer Reviews, and Paper Mills (2021)Retractions, Fake Peer Review…Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology (2021)Investigating the replicabili…Fortification of retraction notices to improve their transparency and usefulness (2021)Fortification of retraction n…Continued use of retracted papers: Temporal trends in citations and (lack of) awareness of retractions shown in citation contexts in biomedicine (2021)Continued use of retracted pa…An Analysis of Recently Retracted Articles by Authors Affiliated with Hospitals in Mainland China (2021)An Analysis of Recently Retra…A multi-perspective analysis of retractions in life sciences (2021)A multi-perspective analysis …A dangerous triangularization of conflicting values in academic publishing: ORCID, fake authors, and risks with the lack of criminalization of the creators of fake elements (2021)A dangerous triangularization…For how long and with what relevance do genetics articles retracted due to research misconduct remain active in the scientific literature (2020)For how long and with what re…Authors' noninstitutional emails and their correlation with retraction (2020)Authors' noninstitutional ema…Journal Retractions in Oncology: A Bibliometric Study (2019)Journal Retractions in Oncolo…Continued Citation of Retracted Radiation Oncology Literature—Do We Have a Problem? (2018)Continued Citation of Retract…Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science (2006)How citation distortions create unfounded authority: analysis of a citation network (2009)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study (2016)The continued citation of retracted publications in dentistry (2020)Evolution of retracted publications in the medical sciences: Citations analysis, bibliometrics, and altmetrics trends (2023)Retracted articles in scientific literature: A bibliometric analysis from 2003 to 2022 using the Web of Science (2024)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)A survey of retractions in the cardiovascular literature (2021)The Individual Participant Data Integrity Tool for assessing the integrity of randomised trials (2024)Understanding and Using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) Vocabulary to Perform Literature Searches (1994)Retracted articles in the biomedical literature from Indian authors (2021)Poor visibility of retracted articles: a problem that should no longer be ignored (2023)Publishing: The peer-review scam (2014)Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central (2016)An integrated paradigm shift to deal with ‘predatory publishing’ (2021)A Synthesis of the Formats for Correcting Erroneous and Fraudulent Academic Literature, and Associated Challenges (2022)Exploratory analysis of text duplication in peer-review reveals peer-review fraud and paper mills (2022)The (ir)rational consideration of the cost of science in transition economies (2017)Reform retractions to make them more transparent (2020)Academic Librarians and Their Role in Disseminating Accurate Knowledge and Information about the Gray Zone in Predatory Publishing (2022)Integrity of randomized clinical trials: Performance of integrity tests and checklists requires assessment (2023)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Citation of retracted research: a case-controlled, ten-year follow-up scientometric analysis of Scott S. Reuben’s malpractice (2022)Citation Contamination by Paper Mill Articles in Systematic Reviews of the Life Sciences (2025)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Challenges for assessing replicability in preclinical cancer biology (2021)The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes (2023)Reproducibility in machine‐learning‐based research: Overview, barriers, and drivers (2025)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Automatic classification of citation function (2006)Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals (2015)Reducing the Inadvertent Spread of Retracted Science: recommendations from the RISRS report (2022)The indexation of retracted literature in seven principal scholarly databases: a coverage comparison of dimensions, OpenAlex, PubMed, Scilit, Scopus, The Lens and Web of Science (2024)Linking citation and retraction data reveals the demographics of scientific retractions among highly cited authors (2025)Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES) (2004)Survey Research (2019)What is replication? (2020)How to Stop the Unknowing Citation of Retracted Papers (2022)A bibliometric study of article retractions in technology fields in developing economies countries (2023)Characteristics of retracted publications related to pain research: a systematic review (2023)Retracted papers originating from paper mills: cross sectional study (2022)The strain on scientific publishing (2024)The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology436 cited
  • 2021The fight against fake-paper factories that churn out sham science251 cited
  • 2021Continued use of retracted papers: Temporal trends in citations and (lack of) awareness of retractions shown in citation contexts in biomedicine97 cited
  • 2021Retractions, Fake Peer Reviews, and Paper Mills80 cited
  • 2021A multi-perspective analysis of retractions in life sciences53 cited
  • 2021Fortification of retraction notices to improve their transparency and usefulness46 cited
  • 2021Team size and retracted citations reveal the patterns of retractions from 1981 to 202045 cited
  • 2018Continued Citation of Retracted Radiation Oncology Literature—Do We Have a Problem?42 cited
  • 2019Journal Retractions in Oncology: A Bibliometric Study38 cited
  • 2022Inappropriate Citation of Retracted Articles in Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine Publications34 cited
  • 2022Non‐author entities accountable for retractions: A diachronic and cross‐disciplinary exploration of reasons for retraction28 cited
  • 2021An Analysis of Recently Retracted Articles by Authors Affiliated with Hospitals in Mainland China22 cited
  • 2020For how long and with what relevance do genetics articles retracted due to research misconduct remain active in the scientific literature21 cited
  • 2020

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Authors' noninstitutional emails and their correlation with retraction
11 cited
  • 2021A dangerous triangularization of conflicting values in academic publishing: ORCID, fake authors, and risks with the lack of criminalization of the creators of fake elements11 cited
  • 2022Issues and Challenges to Reproducibility of Cancer Research: A Commentary8 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.