SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
COVID-19 publications in top-ranked public health journals during the first phase of the pandemic
16 references·0 citing·48 second hop
COVID-19 publications in top-ranked public health journals during the first phase of the pandemic (2023)COVID-19 publications in top-ranked publi…Methodological quality of COVID-19 clinical research (2021)Methodological quality of COV…Following the science? Comparison of methodological and reporting quality of covid-19 and other research from the first wave of the pandemic (2021)Following the science? Compar…COVID-19-related medical research: a meta-research and critical appraisal (2021)COVID-19-related medical rese…The carnage of substandard research during the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for quality (2020)The carnage of substandard re…Scientific quality of COVID-19 and SARS CoV-2 publications in the highest impact medical journals during the early phase of the pandemic: A case control study (2020)Scientific quality of COVID-1…Pandemic publishing: Medical journals strongly speed up their publication process for COVID-19 (2020)Pandemic publishing: Medical …Pandemic publishing poses a new COVID-19 challenge (2020)Pandemic publishing poses a n…Knowledge and Perceptions of COVID-19 Among Health Care Workers: Cross-Sectional Study (2020)Knowledge and Perceptions of …Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Google Scholar, Microsoft Aca…Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Google Scholar, Microsoft Aca…The natural selection of bad science (2016)The natural selection of bad …Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)Academic Research in the 21st…Ranking journals: could Google Scholar Metrics be an alternative to Journal Citation Reports and Scimago Journal Rank? (2013)Ranking journals: could Googl…Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Deep impact: unintended conse…High Impact = High Statistical Standards? Not Necessarily So (2012)High Impact = High Statistica…Comparisons of Citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for Articles Published in General Medical Journals (2009)Comparisons of Citations in W…Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)A bibliometric-based survey on AHP and TOPSIS techniques (2017)Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases (2019)Application of bibliometrics in medicine: a historical bibliometrics analysis (2020)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)The N-Pact Factor: Evaluating the Quality of Empirical Journals with Respect to Sample Size and Statistical Power (2014)"I always assumed that I wasn't really that close to [her]" (2015)Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations (2019)Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (1990)Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (1991)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)How Many Participants Do We Have to Include in Properly Powered Experiments? A Tutorial of Power Analysis with Reference Tables (2019)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)Little Science, Big Science (1963)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart's Law in action (2019)The Triumph of Nonsense in Management Studies (2019)Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES) (2004)Assessment of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perception of Health Care Workers Regarding COVID-19, A Cross-Sectional Study from Egypt (2020)Coronavirus Disease-2019: Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices of Health Care Workers at Makerere University Teaching Hospitals, Uganda (2020)Medical Students and COVID-19: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Precautionary Measures. A Descriptive Study From Jordan (2020)Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies (2020)Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic (2021)Citationchaser: A tool for transparent and efficient forward and backward citation chasing in systematic searching (2022)Exploratory Bibliometrics: Using VOSviewer as a Preliminary Research Tool (2023)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)How swamped preprint servers are blocking bad coronavirus research (2020)How COVID-19 has fundamentally changed clinical research in global health (2021)Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 (2018)Keep up with the latest coronavirus research (2020)LitCovid: an open database of COVID-19 literature (2020)Trust and the Coronavirus Pandemic: What are the Consequences of and for Trust? An Early Review of the Literature (2020)Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)A systematic scoping review of research on COVID ‐19 impacts on eating disorders: A critical appraisal of the evidence and recommendations for the field (2021)Circadian disturbances, sleep difficulties and the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)COVID-19 pandemic effects on health worker’s mental health: Systematic review and meta-analysis (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2020Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations1,016 cited
  • 2020Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations916 cited
  • 2016The natural selection of bad science858 cited
  • 2009Comparisons of Citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for Articles Published in General Medical Journals819 cited
  • 2020Knowledge and Perceptions of COVID-19 Among Health Care Workers: Cross-Sectional Study817 cited
  • 2016Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition685 cited
  • 2013Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank440 cited
  • 2020Pandemic publishing: Medical journals strongly speed up their publication process for COVID-19268 cited
  • 2020Pandemic publishing poses a new COVID-19 challenge259 cited
  • 2021Methodological quality of COVID-19 clinical research189 cited
  • 2020The carnage of substandard research during the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for quality177 cited
  • 2021COVID-19-related medical research: a meta-research and critical appraisal172 cited
  • 2013Ranking journals: could Google Scholar Metrics be an alternative to Journal Citation Reports and Scimago Journal Rank?107 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2020Scientific quality of COVID-19 and SARS CoV-2 publications in the highest impact medical journals during the early phase of the pandemic: A case control study88 cited
  • 2012High Impact = High Statistical Standards? Not Necessarily So79 cited
  • 2021Following the science? Comparison of methodological and reporting quality of covid-19 and other research from the first wave of the pandemic77 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.