Female Surgical Ergonomics in Otolaryngology: A Qualitative Study

Elliot Morse · Lexa Harpel · Hayley L. Born · Anaïs Rameau

17 citations0/0 files storedThe Laryngoscope

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Diversity and Career in Medicine Sex and Gender in Healthcare Occupational health in dentistry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the surgical ergonomic challenges experienced by women in otolaryngology, identify specific equipment that is ergonomically challenging, and assess the impact of suboptimal ergonomics on female otolaryngologists. METHODS: We performed a qualitative study using an interpretive framework rooted in grounded theory. We performed semi-structured qualitative interviews of 14 female otolaryngologists from nine institutions at various stages in training and across subspecialties. Interviews were independently analyzed by thematic content analysis by two researchers and inter-rater reliability was assessed via Cohen's kappa. Differing opinions were reconciled via discussion. RESULTS: Participants noted difficulties with equipment including microscopes, chairs, step stools, and tables as well as difficulty using larger surgical instruments, preference for smaller instruments, frustration with lack of smaller instruments, and a desire for a larger spectrum of instrument sizes. Participants reported neck, hand, and back pain associated with operating. Participants suggested modifications to the operative environment, including a wider variety of instrument sizes, adjustable instruments, and more focus and attention on ergonomic issues and the range of surgeon physiques. Participants felt that optimizing their operating room set-up was an additional burden on them, and that lack of inclusive instrumentation affected their sense of belonging. Participants emphasized positive stories of mentorship and empowerment from peers and superiors of all genders. CONCLUSION: Female otolaryngologists face unique ergonomic challenges. As the otolaryngology workforce becomes increasingly diverse, it is important to address the needs of a diverse set of physiques to avoid inadvertently disadvantaging certain individuals. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A Laryngoscope, 133:3034-3041, 2023.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 17 citations exist upstream.

References

1997Gender Differences in Seff-Perceptions: Convergent Evidence from Three Measures of Accuracy and Bias 2014Musculoskeletal occupational injury among surgeons: effects for patients, providers, and institutions 1992Focus on psychometrics the kappa statistic for establishing interrater reliability in the secondary analysis of qualitative clinical data 2004The relationship between hand size and difficulty using surgical instruments: A survey of 726 laparoscopic surgeons 2003Prevalence of back and neck pain amongst ENT consultants: national survey 2020Belonging, Respectful Inclusion, and Diversity in Medical Education 2011Work environment discomfort and injury: an ergonomic survey study of the American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology members 2018Ergonomic hazards in otolaryngology

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.