SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Involvement of information specialists and statisticians in systematic reviews
16 references·0 citing·51 second hop
Involvement of information specialists and statisticians in systematic reviews (2023)Involvement of information specialists an…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the…The new definition of health technology assessment: A milestone in international collaboration (2020)The new definition of health …Systematic searching: Practical ideas for improving results (2020)Systematic searching: Practic…Undertaking network meta‐analyses (2019)Undertaking network meta‐anal…Completing ‘Summary of findings’ tables and grading the certainty of the evidence (2019)Completing ‘Summary of findin…Choosing effect measures and computing estimates of effect (2019)Choosing effect measures and …Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial (2019)Assessing risk of bias in a r…Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses (2019)Analysing data and undertakin…Roles for librarians in systematic reviews: a scoping review (2018)Roles for librarians in syste…Ensuring quality as the basis of evidence synthesis: leveraging information specialists' knowledge, skills, and expertise (2018)Ensuring quality as the basis…The influence of the team in conducting a systematic review (2017)The influence of the team in …In‐house peer supported literature search training: a public health perspective (2017)In‐house peer supported liter…AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisa…Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future? (2013)Methodological developments i…Systematic reviews need systematic searchers. (2005)Systematic reviews need syste…Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions (1997)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? (2000)A structured approach to documenting a search strategy for publication: A 12 step guideline for authors (2012)Google Scholar as replacement for systematic literature searches: good relative recall and precision are not enough (2013)Meta-Analytic Methodology for Basic Research: A Practical Guide (2019)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial (2010)Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses (2011)The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations (2015)Understanding the Basics of Meta-Analysis and How to Read a Forest Plot (2020)Introduction to Meta-Analysis (2021)School-based depression and anxiety prevention programs: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis (2021)Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis (2007)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)GRADE approach to drawing conclusions from a network meta-analysis using a minimally contextualised framework (2020)Video calls for reducing social isolation and loneliness in older people: a rapid review (2020)Interventions for self-harm in children and adolescents (2021)Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample (2005)Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range (2014)Association between overweight/obesity with depression, anxiety, low self-esteem, and body dissatisfaction in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies (2020)A meta‐analysis of problem gambling risk factors in the general adult population (2021)Musculoskeletal pain and sedentary behaviour in occupational and non-occupational settings: a systematic review with meta-analysis (2021)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Agreement between the Cochrane risk of bias tool and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale: A meta-epidemiological study of randomized controlled trials of physical therapy interventions (2019)Blinding and expectancy confounds in psychedelic randomized controlled trials (2021)Using progress feedback to improve outcomes and reduce drop-out, treatment duration, and deterioration: A multilevel meta-analysis (2021)Budget Impact Analysis—Principles of Good Practice: Report of the ISPOR 2012 Budget Impact Analysis Good Practice II Task Force (2013)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force (2013)Systematic Review of Health Economic Evaluations Focused on Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: The Tortoise and the Cheetah (2021)The ecosystem of health decision making: from fragmentation to synergy (2022)Treatment with psychedelics is psychotherapy: beyond reductionism (2023)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)The role of masculinity in men's help-seeking for depression: A systematic review (2016)Mean Difference, Standardized Mean Difference (SMD), and Their Use in Meta-Analysis (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews107,380 cited
  • 2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both10,605 cited
  • 2021PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews3,654 cited
  • 2019Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses2,667 cited
  • 2019Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial1,761 cited
  • 2019Choosing effect measures and computing estimates of effect970 cited
  • 2019Completing ‘Summary of findings’ tables and grading the certainty of the evidence668 cited
  • 2020The new definition of health technology assessment: A milestone in international collaboration538 cited
  • 2005Systematic reviews need systematic searchers.257 cited
  • 2019Undertaking network meta‐analyses242 cited
  • 2018Roles for librarians in systematic reviews: a scoping review156 cited
  • 2013Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future?112 cited
  • 2017The influence of the team in conducting a systematic review54 cited
  • 2020Systematic searching: Practical ideas for improving results23 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2018
Ensuring quality as the basis of evidence synthesis: leveraging information specialists' knowledge, skills, and expertise
20 cited
  • 2017In‐house peer supported literature search training: a public health perspective6 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.