Sustainable Healthcare to Provide Quality Care in the Surgical Industry in the United Kingdom

Abstract

The surgical industry makes a major contribution to sustainable healthcare. This article aims to critically evaluate sustainable healthcare to provide quality surgical care in the United Kingdom. For this study, a systematic review was conducted using peer-reviewed studies and articles from the United Kingdom related to surgical and anesthetic fields that were published within the last five years. The journal articles were selected based on their relevance to the sustainability and performance of the healthcare system, including risks, and subsequently screened using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 model screening approach. The findings of the relevant journal articles were then critically evaluated for each theme. A total of 79 studies were retrieved, and 15 of the retrieved studies met the inclusion criteria. Of those, 10 articles evaluated existing sustainability practices, only seven articles discussed significant determinants of quality healthcare, and only 86.67% of the articles highlighted the implications of sustainability. The key predictors of high-quality medical care are effective resource management, the acquisition of a moral surgical team, the provision of professional services, integration, short hospital stays, and low mortality and morbidity rates. Conserving water, optimizing treatment routes and transportation, and creating cultural change were found to be the pillars of high-quality, sustainable healthcare. The concept of sustainability varied between these studies, and limitations on sustainability as a result of reduced mortality, morbidity, and business services were observed. Anesthetic gas emissions from operating rooms continue to have the most detrimental effect on the sustainability of the surgical industry. A significant gap was noted between the available data and their implications.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 5 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.