SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Does the perceived quality of interdisciplinary research vary between fields?
16 references·1 citing·45 second hop
Does the perceived quality of interdisciplinary research vary between fields? (2023)Does the perceived quality of interdiscip…Scientists rise up against statistical significance (2019)Scientists rise up against st…Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Citations, Citation Indicator…Wicked and less wicked problems: a typology and a contingency framework (2017)Wicked and less wicked proble…Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review (2017)Reviewer bias in single- vers…The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015)The Metric Tide: Independent …Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Man…Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping (2014)Measuring the effectiveness o…Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature (2010)Approaches to understanding a…Defining Interdisciplinary Research: Conclusions from a Critical Review of the Literature (2006)Defining Interdisciplinary Re…What is Originality in the Humanities and the Social Sciences? (2004)What is Originality in the Hu…Hierarchy of evidence: a framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions (2002)Hierarchy of evidence: a fram…Mode 2 society and the emergence of context-sensitive science (2000)Mode 2 society and the emerge…Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Nepotism and sexism in peer-r…The Hierarchy of the Sciences? (1983)The Hierarchy of the Sciences?Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Peer-review practices of psyc…Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Chance and Consensus in Peer …The role of non-scientific factors vis-à-vis the quality of publications in determining their scholarly impact (2024)The role of non-scientific fa…The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences (1992)Effective University – Industry Interaction: (2002)Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research (2004)Analyzing interdisciplinarity: Typology and indicators (2009)Interdisciplinarity: A Critical Assessment (2009)Document co-citation analysis to enhance transdisciplinary research (2018)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Statistical principles in experimental design. (1962)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Toward an experimental ecology of human development. (1977)Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. (1995)Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Sustainability (2011)The Significance of Insecure and Disorganized Attachment for Children’s Internalizing Symptoms: A Meta-Analytic Study (2012)Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers (1963)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents (1973)Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management (2010)How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between Innovation Studies and Business & Management (2012)Supply chain disruption during the COVID-19 pandemic: Recognizing potential disruption management strategies (2022)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Estudos de revisão sistemática: um guia para síntese criteriosa da evidência científica (2007)11 Evidence in Management and Organizational Science: Assembling the Field’s Full Weight of Scientific Knowledge Through Syntheses (2008)Shades of Grey: Guidelines for Working with the Grey Literature in Systematic Reviews for Management and Organizational Studies (2016)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists (2020)Is the open access citation advantage real? A systematic review of the citation of open access and subscription-based articles (2021)Leadership styles and sustainable performance: A systematic literature review (2022)The Statistical Crisis in Science (2014)How should systematic reviewers handle conference abstracts? A view from the trenches (2019)Sample size evolution in neuroimaging research: An evaluation of highly-cited studies (1990–2012) and of latest practices (2017–2018) in high-impact journals (2020)Rewriting results sections in the language of evidence (2021)From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis (1983)Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments (2006)Performance in Competitive Environments: Gender Differences (2003)The Science of Sex Differences in Science and Mathematics (2007)Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science (2011)Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart's Law in action (2019)Exploratory Research (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2019Scientists rise up against statistical significance2,997 cited
  • 2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics2,816 cited
  • 1997Nepotism and sexism in peer-review1,346 cited
  • 2019Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories1,252 cited
  • 1982Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again1,071 cited
  • 2002Hierarchy of evidence: a framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions993 cited
  • 2010Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature770 cited
  • 2006Defining Interdisciplinary Research: Conclusions from a Critical Review of the Literature640 cited
  • 1981Chance and Consensus in Peer Review623 cited
  • 2015The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management610 cited
  • 2017Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review605 cited
  • 2017Wicked and less wicked problems: a typology and a contingency framework527 cited
  • 1983The Hierarchy of the Sciences?485 cited
  • 2000Mode 2 society and the emergence of context-sensitive science353 cited
  • 2014

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping
337 cited
  • 2004What is Originality in the Humanities and the Social Sciences?333 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024The role of non-scientific factors vis-à-vis the quality of publications in determining their scholarly impact8 cited