Articlebronze2023

Another Point of View: Scholarly Responses to the State of Third-Person Research

Mike Schmierbach · Julie L. Andsager · Stephen A. Banning · Myojung Chung · Benjamin A. Lyons · Douglas M. McLeod +4 more

6 citations0/0 files storedMass Communication & Society

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Media Studies and Communication Journalism and Media Studies Media Influence and Health

Abstract

In a series of essays, scholars respond to Perloff and Shen’s article, “The Third-Person Effect 40 Years After Davison Penned It.” They offer further thoughts on how to measure the phenomenon, where future research is headed, and even whether the effect is real.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 6 citations exist upstream.

References

1979Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence.2012Affect, Not Ideology 1983The Third-Person Effect in Communication 1985The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre.1987Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: An empirical and theoretical review.2012The SAGE Handbook of Persuasion: Developments in Theory and Practice 2020Searching for the backfire effect: Measurement and design considerations.1993THIRD-PERSON EFFECT RESEARCH 1983–1992: A REVIEW AND SYNTHESIS

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.