SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Do AI chatbots improve students learning outcomes? Evidence from a meta‐analysis
16 references·0 citing·42 second hop
Do AI chatbots improve students learning outcomes? Evidence from a meta‐analysis (2023)Do AI chatbots improve students learning …Collaborating With ChatGPT: Considering the Implications of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Journalism and Media Education (2023)Collaborating With ChatGPT: C…Using AI chatbots to provide self-help depression interventions for university students: A randomized trial of effectiveness (2022)Using AI chatbots to provide …Natural language processing applied to mental illness detection: a narrative review (2022)Natural language processing a…Exploring AI chatbot affordances in the EFL classroom: young learners’ experiences and perspectives (2022)Exploring AI chatbot affordan…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…Does gamification improve student learning outcome? Evidence from a meta-analysis and synthesis of qualitative data in educational contexts (2020)Does gamification improve stu…Stimulating and sustaining interest in a language course: An experimental comparison of Chatbot and Human task partners (2017)Stimulating and sustaining in…Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step-by-Step Approach (2017)Research Synthesis and Meta-A…The benefits of publishing systematic quantitative literature reviews for PhD candidates and other early-career researchers (2013)The benefits of publishing sy…Does coaching work? A meta-analysis on the effects of coaching on individual level outcomes in an organizational context (2013)Does coaching work? A meta-an…The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's …Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields (2004)Standard Quality Assessment C…Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Quantifying heterogeneity in …Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funne…Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Statistical Methods for Meta-…Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. (1968)Weighted kappa: Nominal scale…Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2009)A systematic literature review of risk and gender research in tourism (2016)Multi-criteria decision-making for flood risk management: a survey of the current state of the art (2016)A systematic review of climate change education: giving children and young people a ‘voice’ and a ‘hand’ in redressing climate change (2019)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2021)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. (2006)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)The Impact of Enhancing Students’ Social and Emotional Learning: A Meta-Analysis of School-Based Universal Interventions (2011)Theory of Mental Tests (1950)Theory and Methods of Scaling (1958)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. (1971)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. (2005)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Social media use in healthcare: A systematic review of effects on patients and on their relationship with healthcare professionals (2016)The job demands-resources model: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies (2018)Quality assessment with diverse studies (QuADS): an appraisal tool for methodological and reporting quality in systematic reviews of mixed- or multi-method studies (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)How to properly use the PRISMA Statement (2021)Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement (2021)CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)I.—COMPUTING MACHINERY AND INTELLIGENCE (1950)From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing (2023)The impact of ChatGPT on higher education (2023)Transforming Education: A Comprehensive Review of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Educational Settings through Bibliometric and Content Analysis (2023)Implicit Racial/Ethnic Bias Among Health Care Professionals and Its Influence on Health Care Outcomes: A Systematic Review (2015)INNOVATION IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND FUTURE RESEARCH AGENDA (2015)Organizational Resilience: A Valuable Construct for Management Research? (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2002Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis36,730 cited
  • 2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,776 cited
  • 2000Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis14,088 cited
  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews13,845 cited
  • 1968Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.8,719 cited
  • 1986Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis.4,785 cited
  • 2017Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step-by-Step Approach1,715 cited
  • 2004Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields1,681 cited
  • 2013The benefits of publishing systematic quantitative literature reviews for PhD candidates and other early-career researchers1,336 cited
  • 2023Collaborating With ChatGPT: Considering the Implications of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Journalism and Media Education1,100 cited
  • 2013Does coaching work? A meta-analysis on the effects of coaching on individual level outcomes in an organizational context769 cited
  • 2020Does gamification improve student learning outcome? Evidence from a meta-analysis and synthesis of qualitative data in educational contexts693 cited
  • 2022Natural language processing applied to mental illness detection: a narrative review474 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2017Stimulating and sustaining interest in a language course: An experimental comparison of Chatbot and Human task partners448 cited
  • 2022Exploring AI chatbot affordances in the EFL classroom: young learners’ experiences and perspectives433 cited
  • 2022Using AI chatbots to provide self-help depression interventions for university students: A randomized trial of effectiveness296 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.