Investigating the applicability of human reliability analysis methods during early design stages of non-light-water nuclear power plants

Abstract

Human interventions are an integral part of any system, whether through design, operation, maintenance, or upgrading. Moreover, although the reliance on human intervention in safety-related actions in advanced reactors (e.g., Generation IV) is expected to be reduced or completely replaced by automated actions, nuclear power plants (NPP) require human actions throughout their lifecycle from design, construction, operation, and decommissioning. Hence, the impacts of all operator actions are required to be captured and incorporated in the probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) of the modeled plant. Furthermore, a risk-informed and performance-based design and licensing approach expects that a PRA model, including human reliability analysis (HRA), is developed starting from the early design stages and used to inform all design iterations. However, due to the lack of details during the early design stages, HRA is often postponed until the design is mature enough. Conducting HRA in the final design stages, though adequate in capturing pre-, at-, and post-initiators, comes short of informing the design itself in the iterative design lifecycle. Moreover, due to most HRA methodologies being developed utilizing mostly the operating experience of existing light water reactors, limited guidance is available to the applicability of different HRA methodologies during the early stages of the design. Limited guidance is available, as well, on how to utilize the results of HRA in informing the design of later iterations. Hence, this study presents an investigation of the applicability of different HRA methodologies during the early stages of the design. The structure of a representative set of nine HRA methodologies is assessed against the available operating and emergency procedures within different design stages. Furthermore, these different HRA methodologies are assessed based on the availability of guidance on how to use their results to risk-inform the design in an iterative design process. Finally, the applicability of Open Preliminary Human Importance (OpenPHI) methodology, introduced specifically to implement HRA during early design stages, is assessed during the early stages of the design and compared against other methodologies.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 12 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.