Articlehybrid2023

Values and interventions: dynamic relationships in international doctrines

Mi Lin · Ana Pereira Roders · Ivan Nevzgodin · Wessel de Jonge

7 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation Urban Development and Cultural Heritage Conservation Techniques and Studies

Abstract

Purpose Even if there is a wealth of research highlighting the key role of values and cultural significance for heritage management and, defining specific interventions on built heritage, seldom the relation to their leading values and values hierarchy have been researched. How do values and interventions relate? What values trigger most and least interventions on heritage? How do these values relate and characterize interventions? And what are the values hierarchy that make the interventions on built heritage differ? Design/methodology/approach This paper conducts a systematic content analysis of 69 international doctrinal documents – mainly adopted by Council of Europe, UNESCO, and ICOMOS, during 1877 and 2021. The main aim is to reveal and compare the intervention concepts and their definitions, in relation to values. The intensity of the relationship between intervention concepts and values is determined based on the frequency of mentioned values per intervention. Findings There were three key findings. First, historic, social, and aesthetical values were the most referenced values in international doctrinal documents. Second, while intervention concepts revealed similar definitions and shared common leading values, their secondary values and values hierarchy, e.g. aesthetical or social values, are the ones influencing the variation on their definitions. Third, certain values show contradictory roles in the same intervention concepts from different documents, e.g. political and age values. Originality/value This paper explores a novel comparison between different interventions concepts and definitions, and the role of values. The results can contribute to support further research and practice on clarifying the identified differences.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 7 citations exist upstream.

References

2008ICOMOS Charter for the Interpretation and Presentation of Cultural Heritage Sites 2004Cultural heritage management: a possible role for charters and principles in Asia 2020The semantic conservation of architectural heritage: the missing values 2020Council of Europe Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society (2005)2015Historic urban landscapes : framing the integration of urban and heritage planning in multilevel governance 2012Cultural heritage management and heritage (impact) assessments 2007INTERNATIONAL CHARTERS ON URBAN CONSERVATION: SOME THOUGHTS ON THE PRINCIPLES EXPRESSED IN CURRENT INTERNATIONAL DOCTRINE 2018Heritage, gentrification, participation: Remaking urban landscapes in the name of culture and historic preservation

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.