SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Open Science Standards at Journals that Inform Evidence-Based Policy
16 references·0 citing·40 second hop
Open Science Standards at Journals that Inform Evidence-Based Policy (2023)Open Science Standards at Journals that I…Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)Replicability, Robustness, an…The preregistration revolution (2018)The preregistration revolutionA manifesto for reproducible science (2017)A manifesto for reproducible …What does research reproducibility mean? (2016)What does research reproducib…1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)1,500 scientists lift the lid…The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science (2015)The Extent and Consequences o…Promoting an open research culture (2015)Promoting an open research cu…Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Measuring the Prevalence of Q…Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network (2010)Transparent and accurate repo…Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010)Guidance for Developers of He…Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Dissemination and publication…Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated (2008)Why Most Discovered True Asso…Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Systematic Review of the Empi…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Empirical Evidence for Select…HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known (1998)HARKing: Hypothesizing After …Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2005)Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning (2017)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)False-Positive Psychology (2011)An Open, Large-Scale, Collaborative Effort to Estimate the Reproducibility of Psychological Science (2012)Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology (2013)Strong Inference (1964)The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (1978)Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences (2009)Scientific Utopia (2012)P-curve: A key to the file-drawer. (2013)The Logic of Scientific Discovery (2013)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry (2008)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)How Big Is “Big”? Interpreting Effect Sizes in L2 Research (2014)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Sustainable data analysis with Snakemake (2021)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Thinking, Fast and Slow (2011)Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015 (2018)Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings (2018)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences (2018)The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
  • 20161,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility4,200 cited
  • 2017A manifesto for reproducible science3,368 cited
  • 2015Promoting an open research culture2,686 cited
  • 2012Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling2,240 cited
  • 1998HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known1,988 cited
  • 2018The preregistration revolution1,972 cited
  • 2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
  • 2008Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias1,544 cited
  • 2008Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated1,489 cited
  • 2010Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines1,432 cited
  • 2015The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science1,389 cited
  • 2016What does research reproducibility mean?1,291 cited
  • 2010Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases1,039 cited
  • 2021Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science769 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2010Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network589 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.