SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Assessment of 30 Years of Randomized Controlled Trials in The American Journal of Sports Medicine: 1990-2020
16 references·0 citing·42 second hop
Assessment of 30 Years of Randomized Controlled Trials in The American Journal of Sports Medicine: 1990-2020 (2023)Assessment of 30 Years of Randomized Cont…The Fragility of Statistically Significant Results in Pediatric Orthopaedic Randomized Controlled Trials as Quantified by the Fragility Index: A Systematic Review (2018)The Fragility of Statisticall…The Fragility of Statistically Significant Findings From Randomized Trials in Sports Surgery: A Systematic Survey (2016)The Fragility of Statisticall…Publication and Level of Evidence Trends in The American Journal of Sports Medicine From 1996 to 2011 (2014)Publication and Level of Evid…Trends in Worldwide Volume and Methodological Quality of Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials (2013)Trends in Worldwide Volume an…Risk of bias of randomized controlled trials published in orthopaedic journals (2013)Risk of bias of randomized co…Have Levels of Evidence Improved the Quality of Orthopaedic Research? (2013)Have Levels of Evidence Impro…The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's …A General Framework for the Evaluation of Clinical Trial Quality (2009)A General Framework for the E…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IN ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNALS (2005)LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IN ORTHOPAE…Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)Contradicted and Initially St…The quality of reporting and outcome measures in randomized clinical trials related to upper-extremity disorders (2004)The quality of reporting and …INTRODUCING LEVELS OF EVIDENCE TO THE JOURNAL (2003)INTRODUCING LEVELS OF EVIDENC…Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)Assessing the quality of rand…Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis (1992)Incorporating variations in t…A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)A Coefficient of Agreement fo…A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN THE REVIEW OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC LITERATURE1 (1987)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The Delphi List (1998)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Religious and spiritual interventions in mental health care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials (2015)Complementary religious and spiritual interventions in physical health and quality of life: A systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials (2017)Critical appraisal of nonrandomized studies—A review of recommended and commonly used tools (2018)Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires (1987)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Reliability of Content Analysis: The Case of Nominal Scale Coding (1955)Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic (2012)Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators? (2019)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials (1997)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Journal impact factor: a brief review. (1999)Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification? (2011)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability (2018)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)How to Write a Systematic Review (2013)How Effective is Cultural Competence Training of Healthcare Providers on Improving Patient Satisfaction of Minority Groups? A Systematic Review of Literature (2016)Statistical Fragility and the Role of P Values in the Sports Medicine Literature (2018)The Robustness of Trials That Guide Evidence-Based Orthopaedic Surgery (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1960A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales42,710 cited
  • 2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,820 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,571 cited
  • 2005Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research1,465 cited
  • 1995Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists1,306 cited
  • 2003INTRODUCING LEVELS OF EVIDENCE TO THE JOURNAL1,304 cited
  • 1992Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis640 cited
  • 2005LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IN ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNALS359 cited
  • 2009A General Framework for the Evaluation of Clinical Trial Quality253 cited
  • 2016The Fragility of Statistically Significant Findings From Randomized Trials in Sports Surgery: A Systematic Survey172 cited
  • 2013Risk of bias of randomized controlled trials published in orthopaedic journals83 cited
  • 2004The quality of reporting and outcome measures in randomized clinical trials related to upper-extremity disorders79 cited
  • 2018The Fragility of Statistically Significant Results in Pediatric Orthopaedic Randomized Controlled Trials as Quantified by the Fragility Index: A Systematic Review72 cited
  • 2013Trends in Worldwide Volume and Methodological Quality of Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

64 cited
  • 2013Have Levels of Evidence Improved the Quality of Orthopaedic Research?61 cited
  • 2014Publication and Level of Evidence Trends in The American Journal of Sports Medicine From 1996 to 201148 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.