SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Catalogue of bias: novelty bias
6 references·2 citing·38 second hop
Catalogue of bias: novelty bias (2023)Catalogue of bias: novelty biasCatalogue of bias: selective outcome reporting bias (2022)Catalogue of bias: selective …Catalogue of bias: attrition bias (2018)Catalogue of bias: attrition …Evaluating novel agent effects in multiple‐treatments meta‐regression (2010)Evaluating novel agent effect…Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated (2008)Why Most Discovered True Asso…The fading of reported effectiveness. A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (2006)The fading of reported effect…Effect sizes in cumulative meta-analyses of mental health randomized trials evolved over time (2004)Effect sizes in cumulative me…Many randomized trials in a large systematic review were not registered and had evidence of selective outcome reporting: a metaepidemiological study (2024)Many randomized trials in a l…Early Optimistic Effect in Periodontology and Implant Dentistry Trials (2021)Early Optimistic Effect in Pe…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta-analyses? (2008)The Number of Patients and Events Required to Limit the Risk of Overestimation of Intervention Effects in Meta-Analysis—A Simulation Study (2011)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Trials for Myocardial Infarction (1992)Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study (2002)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision (2011)How Big Is “Big”? Interpreting Effect Sizes in L2 Research (2014)Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study (2008)Indirect and mixed‐treatment comparison, network, or multiple‐treatments meta‐analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool (2012)Conceptual and Technical Challenges in Network Meta-analysis (2013)The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations (2015)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (2011)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration (2015)A Dictionary of Epidemiology (2008)Assessing the impact of attrition in randomized controlled trials (2010)Algorithmic fairness in computational medicine (2022)Defining and evaluating the Hawthorne effect in primary care, a systematic review and meta-analysis (2022)Revising the JBI quantitative critical appraisal tools to improve their applicability: an overview of methods and the development process (2022)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)An introduction to cumulative meta-analysis (2022)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)Clinical trial registration has become more prevalent in physical therapy but it is still inadequate: A meta-research study (2023)Enhancing the quality of reporting of orthodontic clinical research (2024)Selective outcome reporting in trials of behavioural health interventions in health psychology and behavioural medicine journals: a review (2024)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method (2014)How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated1,489 cited
  • 2018Catalogue of bias: attrition bias227 cited
  • 2004Effect sizes in cumulative meta-analyses of mental health randomized trials evolved over time179 cited
  • 2010Evaluating novel agent effects in multiple‐treatments meta‐regression111 cited
  • 2006The fading of reported effectiveness. A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials88 cited
  • 2022Catalogue of bias: selective outcome reporting bias31 cited

Cited by

  • 2021Early Optimistic Effect in Periodontology and Implant Dentistry Trials7 cited
  • 2024Many randomized trials in a large systematic review were not registered and had evidence of selective outcome reporting: a metaepidemiological study6 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work