SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Meta-analysis of (single-cell method) benchmarks reveals the need for extensibility and interoperability
9 references·0 citing·39 second hop
Meta-analysis of (single-cell method) benchmarks reveals the need for extensibility and interoperability (2023)Meta-analysis of (single-cell method) ben…The limitations to our understanding of peer review (2020)The limitations to our unders…Workflow systems turn raw data into scientific knowledge (2019)Workflow systems turn raw dat…Systematic benchmarking of omics computational tools (2019)Systematic benchmarking of om…Recommendations for the packaging and containerizing of bioinformatics software (2019)Recommendations for the packa…Essential guidelines for computational method benchmarking (2019)Essential guidelines for comp…Challenges and recommendations to improve the installability and archival stability of omics computational tools (2019)Challenges and recommendation…Recommendations for the packaging and containerizing of bioinformatics software (2018)Recommendations for the packa…Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure (2018)Modelling science trustworthi…Lessons Learned: Recommendations for Establishing Critical Periodic Scientific Benchmarking (2017)Lessons Learned: Recommendati…The big challenges of big data (2013)The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2016 update (2016)Nextflow enables reproducible computational workflows (2017)Perspectives on automated composition of workflows in the life sciences (2021)Improving bioinformatics software quality through incorporation of software engineering practices (2022)WfBench: Automated Generation of Scientific Workflow Benchmarks (2022)1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)Singularity: Scientific containers for mobility of compute (2017)The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2018 update (2018)Scalable Data Analysis in Proteomics and Metabolomics Using BioContainers and Workflows Engines (2019)The Dockstore: enhancing a community platform for sharing reproducible and accessible computational protocols (2021)Containers in Bioinformatics (2022)A review of bioinformatic pipeline frameworks (2016)Over-optimism in benchmark studies and the multiplicity of design and analysis options when interpreting their results (2021)Genomic reproducibility in the bioinformatics era (2024)Packaging and containerization of computational methods (2024)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Calibrating the Scientific Ecosystem Through Meta-Research (2019)Factors influencing researchers’ journal selection decisions (2020)Interventions to reduce partisan animosity (2022)Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics (2004)Big Data: Astronomical or Genomical? (2015)Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences (2018)Successes and Struggles with Computational Reproducibility: Lessons from the Fragile Families Challenge (2019)A Practical Guide to Metabolomics Software Development (2021)The five pillars of computational reproducibility: bioinformatics and beyond (2023)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Bias in peer review (2012)Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review (2023)Guidance for Authors, Peer Reviewers, and Editors on Use of AI, Language Models, and Chatbots (2023)The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly (2025)Geographical-XGBoost: a new ensemble model for spatially local regression based on gradient-boosted trees (2025)Challenge to scientists: does your ten-year-old code still run? (2020)Using prototyping to choose a bioinformatics workflow management system (2021)Software engineering for scientific big data analysis (2019)BioContainers Registry: Searching Bioinformatics and Proteomics Tools, Packages, and Containers (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2020The limitations to our understanding of peer review383 cited
  • 2018Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure225 cited
  • 2019Essential guidelines for computational method benchmarking198 cited
  • 2019Systematic benchmarking of omics computational tools167 cited
  • 2019Challenges and recommendations to improve the installability and archival stability of omics computational tools90 cited
  • 2019Workflow systems turn raw data into scientific knowledge72 cited
  • 2019Recommendations for the packaging and containerizing of bioinformatics software50 cited
  • 2017Lessons Learned: Recommendations for Establishing Critical Periodic Scientific Benchmarking40 cited
  • 2018Recommendations for the packaging and containerizing of bioinformatics software38 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work