SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Writing statistical methods for ecologists
16 references·0 citing·53 second hop
Writing statistical methods for ecologists (2023)Writing statistical methods for ecologistsA call for clean code to effectively communicate science (2022)A call for clean code to effe…Trends in ecology and conservation over eight decades (2021)Trends in ecology and conserv…Reporting of Basic Statistical Methods in Biomedical Journals: Improved SAMPL Guidelines (2020)Reporting of Basic Statistica…The Principles of Biomedical Scientific Writing: Materials and Methods (2019)The Principles of Biomedical …Ten common statistical mistakes to watch out for when writing or reviewing a manuscript (2019)Ten common statistical mistak…Empowering peer reviewers with a checklist to improve transparency (2018)Empowering peer reviewers wit…Writing up Quantitative Research in the Social and Behavioral Sciences (2016)Writing up Quantitative Resea…Metaresearch for Evaluating Reproducibility in Ecology and Evolution (2016)Metaresearch for Evaluating R…The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013) (2015)The prevalence of statistical…Basic statistical reporting for articles published in Biomedical Journals: The “Statistical Analyses and Methods in the Published Literature” or the SAMPL Guidelines (2014)Basic statistical reporting f…Heavy use of equations impedes communication among biologists (2012)Heavy use of equations impede…Reproducible Research in Computational Science (2011)Reproducible Research in Comp…How to write a scientific paper ? Writing the Methods Section (2011)How to write a scientific pap…Peer review and journal impact factor: the two pillars of contemporary medical publishing. (2010)Peer review and journal impac…What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them? (2008)What errors do peer reviewers…Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists (2007)Effect size, confidence inter…The earth is round (p < .05). (1994)Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2011)P-curve: A key to the file-drawer. (2013)Sample Size, Statistical Power, and False Conclusions in Infant Looking‐Time Research (2017)What You See Is What You Get? Enhancing Methodological Transparency in Management Research (2017)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)Distribution Theory for Glass's Estimator of Effect Size and Related Estimators (1981)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Methodological issues and advances in biological meta-analysis (2012)On effect size. (2012)The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science (2015)A Brief History of Time (1988)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)Levallois lessons: the challenge of integrating mathematical models, quantitative experiments and the archaeological record (2013)Finding Cultural Holes: How Structure and Culture Diverge in Networks of Scholarly Communication (2014)Viziometrics: Analyzing Visual Information in the Scientific Literature (2017)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Declining racial and ethnic representation in clinical academic medicine: A longitudinal study of 16 US medical specialties (2018)Guidelines for Reporting of Statistics for Clinical Research in Urology (2018)Bayesian Analysis Reporting Guidelines (2021)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria (2002)Funding grant proposals for scientific research: retrospective analysis of scores by members of grant review panel (2011)Scientific Utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability (2016)Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central (2016)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)The role of replication studies in ecology (2020)Empirical evidence of widespread exaggeration bias and selective reporting in ecology (2023)Publication bias impacts on effect size, statistical power, and magnitude (Type M) and sign (Type S) errors in ecology and evolutionary biology (2023)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Scholarly journal publishing standards, policies and guidelines (2021)Ten principles for generating accessible and useable COVID‐19 environmental science and a fit‐for‐purpose evidence base (2021)Problems with Peer Review Shine a Light on Gaps in Scientific Training (2023)Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs (2013)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Flow states in adventure recreation: A systematic review and thematic synthesis (2019)A brief guide to the science and art of writing manuscripts in biomedicine (2020)Country differences in the relationship between leadership and employee engagement: A meta-analysis (2020)RESOLVING ECOLOGICAL QUESTIONS THROUGH META-ANALYSIS: GOALS, METRICS, AND MODELS (1999)Quantitative Analysis of Culture Using Millions of Digitized Books (2010)An observational analysis of the trope “A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant” and other cut-and-paste statistical methods (2022)Improving quantitative synthesis to achieve generality in ecology (2022)Why and how we should join the shift from significance testing to estimation (2022)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)Reproducibility in Science (2014)An introduction to Docker for reproducible research (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists3,822 cited
  • 2011Reproducible Research in Computational Science1,446 cited
  • 2014Basic statistical reporting for articles published in Biomedical Journals: The “Statistical Analyses and Methods in the Published Literature” or the SAMPL Guidelines657 cited
  • 2015The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013)510 cited
  • 2019Ten common statistical mistakes to watch out for when writing or reviewing a manuscript237 cited
  • 2008What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them?226 cited
  • 2012Heavy use of equations impedes communication among biologists121 cited
  • 2021Trends in ecology and conservation over eight decades105 cited
  • 2016Metaresearch for Evaluating Reproducibility in Ecology and Evolution95 cited
  • 2018Empowering peer reviewers with a checklist to improve transparency45 cited
  • 2011How to write a scientific paper ? Writing the Methods Section34 cited
  • 2016Writing up Quantitative Research in the Social and Behavioral Sciences28 cited
  • 2022A call for clean code to effectively communicate science25 cited
  • 2010Peer review and journal impact factor: the two pillars of contemporary medical publishing.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

22 cited
  • 2020Reporting of Basic Statistical Methods in Biomedical Journals: Improved SAMPL Guidelines22 cited
  • 2019The Principles of Biomedical Scientific Writing: Materials and Methods19 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.