SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
PROTOCOL: Assessment of outcome reporting bias in studies included in Campbell systematic reviews
16 references·0 citing·35 second hop
PROTOCOL: Assessment of outcome reporting bias in studies included in Campbell systematic reviews (2023)PROTOCOL: Assessment of outcome reporting…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and e…The revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) showed low interrater reliability and challenges in its application (2020)The revised Cochrane risk of …The limitations to our understanding of peer review (2020)The limitations to our unders…RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)RoB 2: a revised tool for ass…Assessing risk of bias due to missing results in a synthesis (2019)Assessing risk of bias due to…ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessin…Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review (2013)Systematic Review of the Empi…The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews (2010)The impact of outcome reporti…Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Dissemination and publication…How Many Studies Do You Need? (2009)How Many Studies Do You Need?Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Systematic Review of the Empi…H.R. Rothstein, A.J. Sutton, & M. Borenstein (Eds.) (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. NewYork: Wiley, xvii+356 p. US$100.00. ISBN: 0-470-87014-1. (2007)H.R. Rothstein, A.J. Sutton, …Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2005)Publication Bias in Meta‐Anal…Underreporting Research Is Scientific Misconduct (1990)Underreporting Research Is Sc…Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)Publication prejudices: An ex…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Teachers’ self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis (2014)Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (2015)Response rates of online surveys in published research: A meta-analysis (2022)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)A Global Perspective on Child Sexual Abuse: Meta-Analysis of Prevalence Around the World (2011)On the costs and benefits of emotional labor: A meta-analysis of three decades of research. (2011)Trial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews with meta-analysis (2017)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)Overweight, Obesity, and Depression (2010)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Travel and the Built Environment (2010)Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning (2017)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews107,380 cited
  • 2019RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,067 cited
  • 2016ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions20,225 cited
  • 2021PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews11,660 cited
  • 2005Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis2,369 cited
  • 2008Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias1,544 cited
  • 2009How Many Studies Do You Need?1,293 cited
  • 2007H.R. Rothstein, A.J. Sutton, & M. Borenstein (Eds.) (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. NewYork: Wiley, xvii+356 p. US$100.00. ISBN: 0-470-87014-1.1,251 cited
  • 2010The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews1,133 cited
  • 2013Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review1,126 cited
  • 2010Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases1,039 cited
  • 1977Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system1,013 cited
  • 1990Underreporting Research Is Scientific Misconduct552 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2020
The revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) showed low interrater reliability and challenges in its application
470 cited
  • 2019Assessing risk of bias due to missing results in a synthesis401 cited
  • 2020The limitations to our understanding of peer review383 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.