SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Application of Open Science Potentials in Research Processes: A Comprehensive Literature Review
16 references·0 citing·50 second hop
The Application of Open Science Potentials in Research Processes: A Comprehensive Literature Review (2023)The Application of Open Science Potential…The dawn of an open exploration era: Emergent principles and practices of open science and innovation of university research teams in a digital world (2020)The dawn of an open explorati…Study Preregistration: An Evaluation of a Method for Transparent Reporting (2020)Study Preregistration: An Eva…Open peer review: promoting transparency in open science (2020)Open peer review: promoting t…An Agenda for Open Science in Communication (2020)An Agenda for Open Science in…Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium (2019)Scientific Integrity Principl…Guidelines for open peer review implementation (2019)Guidelines for open peer revi…Ten considerations for open peer review (2018)Ten considerations for open p…Open science, reproducibility, and transparency in ecology (2018)Open science, reproducibility…Digital open science—Teaching digital tools for reproducible and transparent research (2018)Digital open science—Teaching…Answers to 18 Questions About Open Science Practices (2018)Answers to 18 Questions About…Who support open access publishing? Gender, discipline, seniority and other factors associated with academics’ OA practice (2017)Who support open access publi…Using the Jupyter Notebook as a Tool for Open Science: An Empirical Study (2017)Using the Jupyter Notebook as…How Do Scientists Define Openness? Exploring the Relationship Between Open Science Policies and Research Practice (2016)How Do Scientists Define Open…Promoting an open research culture (2015)Promoting an open research cu…Opening science: towards an agenda of open science in academia and industry (2014)Opening science: towards an a…Extending the Mertonian Norms: Scientists' Subscription to Norms of Research (2010)Extending the Mertonian Norms…The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology (2003)Targeted innovation policy and practice intelligence (TIP2E): concepts and implications for theory, policy and practice (2015)R&D Cooperation and Knowledge Spillover Effects for Sustainable Business Innovation in the Chemical Industry (2018)The impact of Human Resources Information Systems on individual innovation capability in Tunisian companies: The moderating role of affective commitment (2020)Withholding Research Results in Academic Life Science (1997)The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery (2009)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)Sticks and carrots: encouraging open science at its source (2015)A strategic alignment framework for the entrepreneurial university (2021)Biosecurity in an age of open science (2022)Reproducible Research in Computational Science (2011)Assessing and restoring reproducibility of Jupyter notebooks (2020)Fork It: Supporting Stateful Alternatives in Computational Notebooks (2021)Computational reproducibility of Jupyter notebooks from biomedical publications (2024)Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective (2001)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Actionable recommendations for narrowing the science-practice gap in open science (2020)Amplifying Voice in Organizations (2021)The Logic of Scientific Discovery (2013)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)The role of replication studies in ecology (2020)Replication across space and time must be weak in the social and environmental sciences (2021)Containers for computational reproducibility (2023)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science (2015)Personal Motivations and Systemic Incentives: Scientists on Questionable Research Practices (2020)Socio-technical scales in socio-environmental modeling: Managing a system-of-systems modeling approach (2020)Beyond nutrition and physical activity: food industry shaping of the very principles of scientific integrity (2021)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)A power primer. (1992)Qualitative inquiry & research design : choosing among five approaches (2013)A systematic review and meta-analysis of discrepancies between logged and self-reported digital media use (2021)Passive social media use and psychological well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of social comparison and emotion regulation (2021)Social media and well-being: A methodological perspective (2021)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Bias in peer review (2012)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)The Pandemic as a Portal: Reimagining Psychological Science as Truly Open and Inclusive (2022)How to improve scientific peer review: Four schools of thought (2023)The crisis of peer review: Part of the evolution of science (2024)Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony (1977)Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (1989)Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)Normative Dissonance in Science: Results from a National Survey of U.S. Scientists (2007)Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress (2018)How much is too much? The difference between research influence and self-citation excess (2020)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015Promoting an open research culture2,686 cited
  • 2018Open science, reproducibility, and transparency in ecology224 cited
  • 2020An Agenda for Open Science in Communication218 cited
  • 2010Extending the Mertonian Norms: Scientists' Subscription to Norms of Research184 cited
  • 2020Open peer review: promoting transparency in open science167 cited
  • 2019Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium165 cited
  • 2017Using the Jupyter Notebook as a Tool for Open Science: An Empirical Study155 cited
  • 2014Opening science: towards an agenda of open science in academia and industry150 cited
  • 2018Answers to 18 Questions About Open Science Practices147 cited
  • 2016How Do Scientists Define Openness? Exploring the Relationship Between Open Science Policies and Research Practice121 cited
  • 2020The dawn of an open exploration era: Emergent principles and practices of open science and innovation of university research teams in a digital world105 cited
  • 2017Who support open access publishing? Gender, discipline, seniority and other factors associated with academics’ OA practice101 cited
  • 2019Guidelines for open peer review implementation92 cited
  • 2018Ten considerations for open peer review81 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2018Digital open science—Teaching digital tools for reproducible and transparent research80 cited
  • 2020Study Preregistration: An Evaluation of a Method for Transparent Reporting73 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.