The consequences of neglected confounding and interactions in mixed‐effects meta‐regression: An illustrative example

Abstract

Analysts seldom include interaction terms in their meta-regression model, which can introduce bias if an interaction is present. We illustrate this by reanalysing a meta-regression study in acute heart failure. Based on a total of 285 studies, the 1-year mortality rate related to acute heart failure is considered and the connection to the study-level covariates year of recruitment and average age of study participants are of interest. We show that neglecting a possibly confounding variable and an interaction term might lead to erroneous inference and conclusions. Based on our results and accompanying simulations, we recommend to include possible confounders and interaction terms, whenever they are plausible, in mixed-effects meta-regression models.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 7 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.