SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The rise of intelligent research: how should artificial intelligence be assisting researchers in conducting medical literature searches?
2 references·0 citing·9 second hop
The rise of intelligent research: how should artificial intelligence be assisting researchers in conducting medical literature searches? (2023)The rise of intelligent research: how sho…ChatGPT is fun, but not an author (2023)ChatGPT is fun, but not an au…Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews (2021)Artificial intelligence and t…The Handbook of Social Psychology (1969)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (2015)The blended future of automation and AI: Examining some long-term societal and ethical impact features (2023)Artificial intelligence for literature reviews: opportunities and challenges (2024)The SAFE procedure: a practical stopping heuristic for active learning-based screening in systematic reviews and meta-analyses (2024)ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope (2023)Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers (2023)Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2023ChatGPT is fun, but not an author1,433 cited
  • 2021Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews298 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work