No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
In this paper we analyse some aspects of the contemporary libertarian speech from a political‑discursive logics approach (Glynos & Howarth, 2007), based on a corpus made of, on one hand, by Javier Milei’s speeches and, on the other hand, by interviews to libertarian activists. We explore its social logic, tracking nodal signifiers on topics of democracy, state, and politics. We examine its political logic and the rhetorical movements that shape this grammar. Thereon, we explore the phantasmatic logic, which provides the affective grip to this discourse. Finally, we list three ways in which adherents and activists justify their political practice in democracy, where they subvert their own conditions of possibility.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 1 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.