SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Comparison of statistical methods for integrating real‐world evidence in a rare events meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
16 references·0 citing·48 second hopsampled
Comparison of statistical methods for integrating real‐world evidence in a rare events meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials (2023)Comparison of statistical methods for int…GRADE guidance 24 optimizing the integration of randomized and non-randomized studies of interventions in evidence syntheses and health guidelines (2021)GRADE guidance 24 optimizing …When should meta‐analysis avoid making hidden normality assumptions? (2018)When should meta‐analysis avo…A comparison of seven random‐effects models for meta‐analyses that estimate the summary odds ratio (2018)A comparison of seven random‐…Combining randomized and non‐randomized evidence in network meta‐analysis (2017)Combining randomized and non‐…AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisa…ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessin…Meta‐analysis of few small studies in orphan diseases (2016)Meta‐analysis of few small st…Impact of including or excluding both-armed zero-event studies on using standard meta-analysis methods for rare event outcome: a simulation study (2016)Impact of including or exclud…Quality of reporting in systematic reviews of adverse events: systematic review (2014)Quality of reporting in syste…Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials (2014)Healthcare outcomes assessed …Predicting the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analysis, using empirical data from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2012)Predicting the extent of hete…Characteristics of meta-analyses and their component studies in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: a cross-sectional, descriptive analysis (2011)Characteristics of meta-analy…Bias Modelling in Evidence Synthesis (2008)Bias Modelling in Evidence Sy…Bayesian methods in meta-analysis and evidence synthesis (2001)Bayesian methods in meta-anal…Hierarchical models in generalized synthesis of evidence: an example based on studies of breast cancer screening (2000)Hierarchical models in genera…The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)The feasibility of creating a…The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)A Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis (2008)A taxonomy has been developed for outcomes in medical research to help improve knowledge discovery (2017)Music therapy for stress reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)Social media use and risky behaviors in adolescents: A meta‐analysis (2020)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2010)Academic Interventions for Elementary and Middle School Students With Low Socioeconomic Status: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2017)The risk of bias in observational studies of exposures (ROBINS-E) tool: concerns arising from application to observational studies of exposures (2018)Challenges in meta-analyses with observational studies (2020)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Synthesizing evidence on complex interventions: how meta-analytical, qualitative, and mixed-method approaches can contribute (2013)Communicating uncertainty about facts, numbers and science (2019)Synthesising quantitative evidence in systematic reviews of complex health interventions (2019)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Methods for Meta-Analysis in Medical Research (2000)Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment (2004)Recent developments in meta‐analysis (2007)A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prediction model performance (2017)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Methodological index for non‐randomized studies ( MINORS ): development and validation of a new instrument (2003)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap (2014)Automated generation of node‐splitting models for assessment of inconsistency in network meta‐analysis (2015)CINeMA: Software for semiautomated assessment of the confidence in the results of network meta‐analysis (2020)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Selective reporting bias of harm outcomes within studies: findings from a cohort of systematic reviews (2014)Harms Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials of Interventions Aimed at Modifying Microbiota (2018)Adverse events in meditation practices and meditation‐based therapies: a systematic review (2020)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Likelihood-based random-effects meta-analysis with few studies: empirical and simulation studies (2019)Fixed- and Random-Effects Models (2021)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2016ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions20,225 cited
  • 2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both10,605 cited
  • 1998The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.8,247 cited
  • 2012Predicting the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analysis, using empirical data from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews837 cited
  • 2001Bayesian methods in meta-analysis and evidence synthesis711 cited
  • 2014Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials533 cited
  • 2011Characteristics of meta-analyses and their component studies in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: a cross-sectional, descriptive analysis403 cited
  • 2008Bias Modelling in Evidence Synthesis322 cited
  • 2014Quality of reporting in systematic reviews of adverse events: systematic review218 cited
  • 2018A comparison of seven random‐effects models for meta‐analyses that estimate the summary odds ratio203 cited
  • 2016Meta‐analysis of few small studies in orphan diseases190 cited
  • 2017Combining randomized and non‐randomized evidence in network meta‐analysis183 cited
  • 2018When should meta‐analysis avoid making hidden normality assumptions?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

178 cited
  • 2021GRADE guidance 24 optimizing the integration of randomized and non-randomized studies of interventions in evidence syntheses and health guidelines174 cited
  • 2016Impact of including or excluding both-armed zero-event studies on using standard meta-analysis methods for rare event outcome: a simulation study163 cited
  • 2000Hierarchical models in generalized synthesis of evidence: an example based on studies of breast cancer screening137 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.