SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Planning a Cochrane Review of diagnostic test accuracy
16 references·0 citing·43 second hop
Planning a Cochrane Review of diagnostic test accuracy (2023)Planning a Cochrane Review of diagnostic …GRADE guidelines: 21 part 2. Test accuracy: inconsistency, imprecision, publication bias, and other domains for rating the certainty of evidence and presenting it in evidence profiles and summary of findings tables (2020)GRADE guidelines: 21 part 2. …GRADE guidelines: 21 part 1. Study design, risk of bias, and indirectness in rating the certainty across a body of evidence for test accuracy (2020)GRADE guidelines: 21 part 1. …Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)Preferred Reporting Items for…Abstracts of the 25th Cochrane Colloquium (2018)Abstracts of the 25th Cochran…Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how (2017)Living systematic review: 1. …Systematic overview finds variation in approaches to investigating and reporting on sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic studies (2014)Systematic overview finds var…Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap (2014)Living Systematic Reviews: An…Diagnostic tools for alzheimer's disease dementia and other dementias: an overview of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) systematic reviews (2014)Diagnostic tools for alzheime…Cochrane methods - twenty years experience in developing systematic review methods (2013)Cochrane methods - twenty yea…Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews (2013)Cochrane diagnostic test accu…The assessment of the quality of reporting of meta-analyses in diagnostic research: a systematic review (2011)The assessment of the quality…When Is Measuring Sensitivity and Specificity Sufficient To Evaluate a Diagnostic Test, and When Do We Need Randomized Trials? (2006)When Is Measuring Sensitivity…Systematic reviews of diagnostic tests in cancer: review of methods and reporting (2006)Systematic reviews of diagnos…The Science of Reviewing Researcha (1993)The Science of Reviewing Rese…A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)A comparison of results of me…THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1963)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Systematic Reviews: Checklists for review articles (1994)The impact of child sexual abuse on health: A systematic review of reviews (2009)Sampling in Qualitative Research: Insights from an Overview of the Methods Literature (2015)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements (2019)Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application (2019)Users' Guides to the Medical Literature (1999)The evaluation of diagnostic tests: evidence on technical and diagnostic accuracy, impact on patient outcome and cost-effectiveness is needed (2007)A comprehensive regulatory framework to address the unmet need for new antibacterial treatments (2013)Evaluating medical tests (2023)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)Diagnostic test accuracy (2015)Modelling multiple thresholds in meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (2016)Evaluating medical tests: introducing the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (2023)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort (2017)Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting (2018)Comparison of mental health symptoms before and during the covid-19 pandemic: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis of 134 cohorts (2023)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Accuracy of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for screening to detect major depression: individual participant data meta-analysis (2019)Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas (2021)Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement (2021)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed (2005)GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence (2011)GRADE Guidance: 31. Assessing the certainty across a body of evidence for comparative test accuracy (2021)Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews (2023)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)GRADE guidelines: 21 part 2. Inconsistency, Imprecision, publication bias and other domains for rating the certainty of evidence for test accuracy and presenting it in evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. (2020)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)A scoping review of rapid review methods (2015)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2019Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions14,763 cited
  • 2018Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies3,196 cited
  • 1992A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction1,517 cited
  • 2017Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how652 cited
  • 2014Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap595 cited
  • 1993The Science of Reviewing Researcha473 cited
  • 2020GRADE guidelines: 21 part 1. Study design, risk of bias, and indirectness in rating the certainty across a body of evidence for test accuracy408 cited
  • 2020GRADE guidelines: 21 part 2. Test accuracy: inconsistency, imprecision, publication bias, and other domains for rating the certainty of evidence and presenting it in evidence profiles and summary of findings tables389 cited
  • 2013Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews297 cited
  • 2006When Is Measuring Sensitivity and Specificity Sufficient To Evaluate a Diagnostic Test, and When Do We Need Randomized Trials?268 cited
  • 2013Cochrane methods - twenty years experience in developing systematic review methods136 cited
  • 2006Systematic reviews of diagnostic tests in cancer: review of methods and reporting80 cited
  • 2011The assessment of the quality of reporting of meta-analyses in diagnostic research: a systematic review

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

71 cited
  • 2014Systematic overview finds variation in approaches to investigating and reporting on sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic studies36 cited
  • 2014Diagnostic tools for alzheimer's disease dementia and other dementias: an overview of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) systematic reviews27 cited
  • 2018Abstracts of the 25th Cochrane Colloquium22 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.