SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Improving the value of letters in biomedicine
5 references·0 citing·16 second hop
Improving the value of letters in biomedicine (2023)Improving the value of letters in biomedi…Most Preprint Servers Allow the Publication of Opinion Papers (2023)Most Preprint Servers Allow t…The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An…The importance for journals to publish commentaries and letters to the editor in the age of COVID-19 (2021)The importance for journals t…Understanding the nature and scope of clinical research commentaries in PubMed (2019)Understanding the nature and …Are Editors free from bias? The special case of Letters to the Editor (2006)Are Editors free from bias? T…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias) (2011)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Implementing the 27 PRISMA 2020 Statement items for systematic reviews in the sport and exercise medicine, musculoskeletal rehabilitation and sports science fields: the PERSiST (implementing Prisma in Exercise, Rehabilitation, Sport medicine and SporTs science) guidance (2021)The use of digital technology for social wellbeing reduces social isolation in older adults: A systematic review (2021)How to conduct systematic literature reviews in management research: a guide in 6 steps and 14 decisions (2023)Editorial independence at medical journals owned by professional associations: A survey of editors (2002)Problems with Traditional Science Publishing and Finding a Wider Niche for Post-Publication Peer Review (2014)Optimizing peer review to minimize the risk of retracting COVID-19-related literature (2020)How Are Scientists Using Social Media in the Workplace? (2016)Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)Preprint Servers’ Policies, Submission Requirements, and Transparency in Reporting and Research Integrity Recommendations (2020)An attempt to explain the partial 'silent' withdrawal or retraction of a SAGE Advance preprint (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews4,227 cited
  • 2019Understanding the nature and scope of clinical research commentaries in PubMed17 cited
  • 2021The importance for journals to publish commentaries and letters to the editor in the age of COVID-199 cited
  • 2006Are Editors free from bias? The special case of Letters to the Editor9 cited
  • 2023Most Preprint Servers Allow the Publication of Opinion Papers6 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work