SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Risk of drug use during pregnancy: master protocol for living systematic reviews and meta-analyses performed in the metaPreg project
16 references·0 citing·39 second hopsampled
Risk of drug use during pregnancy: master protocol for living systematic reviews and meta-analyses performed in the metaPreg project (2023)Risk of drug use during pregnancy: master…Using Embase as a supplement to PubMed in Cochrane reviews differed across fields (2021)Using Embase as a supplement …An epidemic of redundant meta‐analyses (2021)An epidemic of redundant meta…A new taxonomy was developed for overlap across 'overviews of systematic reviews': A meta‐research study of research waste (2021)A new taxonomy was developed …Future of evidence ecosystem series: 1. Introduction Evidence synthesis ecosystem needs dramatic change (2020)Future of evidence ecosystem …Challenges in meta-analyses with observational studies (2020)Challenges in meta-analyses w…A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study (2020)A full systematic review was …Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis (2019)Toward systematic review auto…Time-to-update of systematic reviews relative to the availability of new evidence (2018)Time-to-update of systematic …Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort (2017)Living systematic reviews: 2.…Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how (2017)Living systematic review: 1. …Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry (2017)Analysis of the time and work…An overview of meta-analysis for clinicians (2017)An overview of meta-analysis …The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)The Mass Production of Redund…The contribution of databases to the results of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study (2016)The contribution of databases…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Preferred reporting items for…Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Measuring inconsistency in me…The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis (2001)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Registration of systematic reviews in PROSPERO: 30,000 records and counting (2018)PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis (2022)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)Searching for and selecting studies (2019)The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners (2020)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)The effectiveness of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing toward anxiety disorder: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (2020)Self-learning software tools for data analysis in meta-analysis (2021)A bibliometric analysis of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in ophthalmology (2023)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)The STROBE guidelines (2019)MOOSE Reporting Guidelines for Meta-analyses of Observational Studies (2021)Inflammatory and oxidative stress markers in post-traumatic stress disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2022)Life expectancy and years of potential life lost in people with mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2023)Interrater Reliability in Systematic Review Methodology: Exploring Variation in Coder Decision-Making (2018)The development of software to support multiple systematic review types (2018)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Automation of systematic literature reviews: A systematic literature review (2021)Can ChatGPT Write a Good Boolean Query for Systematic Review Literature Search? (2023)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2003Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses63,086 cited
  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation13,139 cited
  • 2016The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses1,499 cited
  • 2017Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry733 cited
  • 2020A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study688 cited
  • 2017Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how652 cited
  • 2019Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis647 cited
  • 2017Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort359 cited
  • 2017An overview of meta-analysis for clinicians310 cited
  • 2020Challenges in meta-analyses with observational studies297 cited
  • 2016The contribution of databases to the results of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study127 cited
  • 2018Time-to-update of systematic reviews relative to the availability of new evidence72 cited
  • 2020Future of evidence ecosystem series: 1. Introduction Evidence synthesis ecosystem needs dramatic change66 cited
  • 2021Using Embase as a supplement to PubMed in Cochrane reviews differed across fields

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

59 cited
  • 2021A new taxonomy was developed for overlap across 'overviews of systematic reviews': A meta‐research study of research waste29 cited
  • 2021An epidemic of redundant meta‐analyses28 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.