SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evaluating the completeness of the reporting of abstracts since the publication of the CONSORT extension for abstracts: an evaluation of randomized controlled trial in ten nursing journals
16 references·0 citing·49 second hop
Evaluating the completeness of the reporting of abstracts since the publication of the CONSORT extension for abstracts: an evaluation of randomized controlled trial in ten nursing journals (2023)Evaluating the completeness of the report…Outcome reporting recommendations for clinical trial protocols and reports: a scoping review (2020)Outcome reporting recommendat…Oncology trial abstracts showed suboptimal improvement in reporting: a comparative before-and-after evaluation using CONSORT for Abstract guidelines (2014)Oncology trial abstracts show…Improvement in the quality of abstracts in major clinical journals since CONSORT extension for abstracts: A systematic review (2014)Improvement in the quality of…Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Clinical Trials of Surgical Interventions (2013)Comparison of Registered and …Quality of Reporting in Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Leading Journals of Periodontology and Implant Dentistry: A Survey (2012)Quality of Reporting in Abstr…The quality of safety reporting in trials is still suboptimal: Survey of major general medical journals (2010)The quality of safety reporti…Low quality of reporting adverse drug reactions in paediatric randomised controlled trials (2010)Low quality of reporting adve…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…Quality of reporting Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) in the nursing literature: Application of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) (2008)Quality of reporting Randomiz…CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)CONSORT for Reporting Randomi…Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials (2007)Impact of allocation concealm…Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2004)Clinical trial registration: …The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revise…Physician Interpretations and Textbook Definitions of Blinding Terminology in Randomized Controlled Trials (2001)Physician Interpretations and…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Measurement of Observer A…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2008)PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts (2013)The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development (2013)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)THE QUALITY OF REPORTING OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS IN THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY FROM 1988 THROUGH 2000 (2002)Turning a blind eye: the success of blinding reported in a random sample of randomised, placebo controlled trials (2004)The quality of randomized trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statement (2005)Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement (2004)Adherence to CONSORT harms-reporting recommendations in publications of recent analgesic clinical trials: An ACTTION systematic review (2012)Adverse event assessment, analysis, and reporting in recent published analgesic clinical trials: ACTTION systematic review and recommendations (2013)Poor adherence of randomised trials in surgery to CONSORT guidelines for non-pharmacological treatments (NPT): a cross-sectional study (2013)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials (2011)Effectiveness of Treatment Approaches for Children and Adolescents with Reading Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (2014)Association Between Risk-of-Bias Assessments and Results of Randomized Trials in Cochrane Reviews: The ROBES Meta-Epidemiologic Study (2017)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)Is Mandatory Prospective Trial Registration Working to Prevent Publication of Unregistered Trials and Selective Outcome Reporting? An Observational Study of Five Psychiatry Journals That Mandate Prospective Clinical Trial Registration (2015)Outcome Discrepancies and Selective Reporting: Impacting the Leading Journals? (2015)Promoting public access to clinical trial protocols: challenges and recommendations (2018)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. (1994)Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data (1997)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Ítems de referencia para publicar Revisiones Sistemáticas y Metaanálisis: La Declaración PRISMA (2014)Trends in global clinical trial registration: an analysis of numbers of registered clinical trials in different parts of the world from 2004 to 2013 (2015)Reducing bias, increasing transparency and calibrating confidence with preregistration (2023)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,000 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials9,314 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials2,545 cited
  • 2008CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration670 cited
  • 2007Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials470 cited
  • 2004Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.275 cited
  • 2001Physician Interpretations and Textbook Definitions of Blinding Terminology in Randomized Controlled Trials256 cited
  • 2013Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Clinical Trials of Surgical Interventions101 cited
  • 2010The quality of safety reporting in trials is still suboptimal: Survey of major general medical journals84 cited
  • 2014Improvement in the quality of abstracts in major clinical journals since CONSORT extension for abstracts: A systematic review77 cited
  • 2014Oncology trial abstracts showed suboptimal improvement in reporting: a comparative before-and-after evaluation using CONSORT for Abstract guidelines76 cited
  • 2008

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Quality of reporting Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) in the nursing literature: Application of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT)
67 cited
  • 2010Low quality of reporting adverse drug reactions in paediatric randomised controlled trials57 cited
  • 2020Outcome reporting recommendations for clinical trial protocols and reports: a scoping review48 cited
  • 2012Quality of Reporting in Abstracts of Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Leading Journals of Periodontology and Implant Dentistry: A Survey48 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.