Comparison of Land Cover Categorical Data Stored in OSM and Authoritative Topographic Data

Abstract

This study aims at a comparative analysis of quantitative data, namely, OSM and BDOT10k. Analyses were conducted in a 1 km2 hexagonal grid, in seven test counties located in different regions of Poland, differing in the degree of urbanization, land cover and natural environment. It is assumed that the authors’ consolidated regional classification of the Compound Correspondence Index CCIRn is attributed to the geometric mapping unit based on TOPSIS values, and their statistical measure of dispersion enables the comparison of datasets for individual geographically disjointed areas according to uniform criteria, e.g., the number of topographic features stored in analyzed datasets, both polygonal (buildings, forests, surface water) and linear (roads, watercourses, railroads). The final results of the regional assessment outperform the local classification giving a higher level of data compliance. Overestimation of regional concordance ranges from 9 to 20% of the county area, with an average of 3% reduction in the area where the two datasets (BDOT10k and OSM) have comparable information ranges. Areas of medium and high nonconformity are decreased by an average of 2.4%.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 3 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.