SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Research Assessments Should Recognize Responsible Research Practices. Narrative Review of a Lively Debate and Promising Developments
16 references·0 citing·44 second hop
Research Assessments Should Recognize Responsible Research Practices. Narrative Review of a Lively Debate and Promising Developments (2023)Research Assessments Should Recognize Res…The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)The Hong Kong Principles for …Are women publishing less during the pandemic? Here’s what the data say (2020)Are women publishing less dur…Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication (2018)Transparency in authors’ cont…Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)Assessing scientists for hiri…A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)A manifesto for reproducible …The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015)The Metric Tide: Independent …Systematic inequality and hierarchy in faculty hiring networks (2015)Systematic inequality and hie…Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—a literature review (2015)Evaluation practices and effe…Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Man…Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science (2013)Bibliometrics: Global gender …The Perverse Effects of Competition on Scientists’ Work and Relationships (2007)The Perverse Effects of Compe…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Scientists behaving badly (2005)Scientists behaving badlyIs citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? (1979)Is citation analysis a legiti…The Sociology of Science. Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1975)The Sociology of Science. The…Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system (1971)Patterns of evaluation in sci…Gender Differences in Patenting in the Academic Life Sciences (2006)Science of science (2018)Gender inequality and restrictive gender norms: framing the challenges to health (2019)Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines (2020)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Referencing as Persuasion (1977)Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (1980)Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: A review (1983)Bibliometric Indicators: Quality Measurements of Scientific Publication (2010)Data envelopment analysis 1978–2010: A citation-based literature survey (2012)Back to Bentham? Explorations of Experienced Utility (1997)Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact (2016)The science of science: From the perspective of complex systems (2017)The Diversity–Innovation Paradox in Science (2020)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences (2018)The preregistration revolution (2018)Sustainable data analysis with Snakemake (2021)Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results (1992)Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences (2009)Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Inferential Statistics as Descriptive Statistics: There Is No Replication Crisis if We Don’t Expect Replication (2019)A Family Resemblance Approach to the Nature of Science for Science Education (2010)Establishing sustainability science in higher education institutions: towards an integration of academic development, institutionalization, and stakeholder collaborations (2012)New Directions for Nature of Science Research (2013)Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart's Law in action (2019)Exploratory Research (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
  • 2017A manifesto for reproducible science3,368 cited
  • 2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics2,816 cited
  • 2013Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science1,496 cited
  • 1975The Sociology of Science. Theoretical and Empirical Investigations1,305 cited
  • 2005Scientists behaving badly1,089 cited
  • 1979Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool?908 cited
  • 1971Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system790 cited
  • 2015Systematic inequality and hierarchy in faculty hiring networks621 cited
  • 2015The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management610 cited
  • 2020The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity545 cited
  • 2015Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—a literature review466 cited
  • 2018Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure461 cited
  • 2020Are women publishing less during the pandemic? Here’s what the data say439 cited
  • 2018Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

390 cited
  • 2007The Perverse Effects of Competition on Scientists’ Work and Relationships383 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.