SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
“Dear Doctor, greetings of the day!”: A 1-year observational study of presumed predatory journal invitations
16 references·0 citing·31 second hop
“Dear Doctor, greetings of the day!”: A 1-year observational study of presumed predatory journal invitations (2023)“Dear Doctor, greetings of the day!”: A 1…Dealing with predatory journal articles captured in systematic reviews (2021)Dealing with predatory journa…Predatory Journals: What They Are and How to Avoid Them (2020)Predatory Journals: What They…Checklists to detect potential predatory biomedical journals: a systematic review (2020)Checklists to detect potentia…Predatory journals: no definition, no defence (2019)Predatory journals: no defini…Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis (2019)Blacklists and Whitelists To …What is a predatory journal? A scoping review (2018)What is a predatory journal? …What is a predatory journal? A scoping review (2018)What is a predatory journal? …Problems and challenges of predatory journals (2018)Problems and challenges of pr…Predatory journals (2018)Predatory journalsPotential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison (2017)Potential predatory and legit…Invitations received from potential predatory publishers and fraudulent conferences: a 12-month early-career researcher experience (2017)Invitations received from pot…How stakeholders can respond to the rise of predatory journals (2017)How stakeholders can respond …The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)The academic, economic and so…The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)The academic, economic and so…You are invited to submit… (2015)You are invited to submit…‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)‘Predatory’ open access: a lo…The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)The foreign gaze: authorship in academic global health (2019)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Article Processing Charge Hyperinflation and Price Insensitivity: An Open Access Sequel to the Serials Crisis (2019)Ten simple rules for innovative dissemination of research (2020)Open access: The true cost of science publishing (2013)Stop this waste of people, animals and money (2017)Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)Big data analytics in manufacturing: a bibliometric analysis of research in the field of business management (2021)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Definition of a systematic review used in overviews of systematic reviews, meta-epidemiological studies and textbooks (2019)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Knowledge sharing in global health research – the impact, uptake and cost of open access to scholarly literature (2017)Sci-Hub provides access to nearly all scholarly literature (2018)Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review (2022)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Predatory Journals Spamming for Publications: What Should Researchers Do? (2017)Defining predatory journals and responding to the threat they pose: a modified Delphi consensus process (2020)Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in business and management research: A contemporary overview (2022)Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews (2022)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) (2021)Predatory Journals: What the Researchers and Authors Should Know (2024)Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews (2024)Knowledge and motivations of researchers publishing in presumed predatory journals: a survey (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics818 cited
  • 2019Predatory journals: no definition, no defence725 cited
  • 2016The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review559 cited
  • 2017Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison384 cited
  • 2018Problems and challenges of predatory journals227 cited
  • 2020Predatory Journals: What They Are and How to Avoid Them190 cited
  • 2016The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review182 cited
  • 2018What is a predatory journal? A scoping review156 cited
  • 2018What is a predatory journal? A scoping review142 cited
  • 2020Checklists to detect potential predatory biomedical journals: a systematic review138 cited
  • 2019Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis131 cited
  • 2015You are invited to submit…114 cited
  • 2021Dealing with predatory journal articles captured in systematic reviews71 cited
  • 2017Invitations received from potential predatory publishers and fraudulent conferences: a 12-month early-career researcher experience53 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2018
Predatory journals
53 cited
  • 2017How stakeholders can respond to the rise of predatory journals43 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.