SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Kenward‐Roger–type corrections for inference methods of network meta‐analysis and meta‐regression
16 references·0 citing·43 second hop
Kenward‐Roger–type corrections for inference methods of network meta‐analysis and meta‐regression (2023)Kenward‐Roger–type corrections for infere…netmeta : An R Package for Network Meta-Analysis Using Frequentist Methods (2023)netmeta : An R Package for Ne…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Random effects meta‐analysis: Coverage performance of 95 % confidence and prediction intervals following REML estimation (2016)Random effects meta‐analysis:…Network Meta-analysis (2015)Network Meta-analysisA design‐by‐treatment interaction model for network meta‐analysis with random inconsistency effects (2014)A design‐by‐treatment interac…Indirect and mixed‐treatment comparison, network, or multiple‐treatments meta‐analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool (2012)Indirect and mixed‐treatment …Consistency and inconsistency in network meta‐analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta‐regression (2012)Consistency and inconsistency…Consistency and inconsistency in network meta‐analysis: concepts and models for multi‐arm studies (2012)Consistency and inconsistency…Multivariate Random-effects Meta-regression: Updates to Mvmeta (2011)Multivariate Random-effects M…Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (2008)Systematic Reviews of Diagnos…Evaluation of networks of randomized trials (2007)Evaluation of networks of ran…Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests (2001)Systematic reviews of evaluat…Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests (2001)Systematic reviews of evaluat…Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials (1997)Discrepancies between Meta-An…BORROWING STRENGTH FROM EXTERNAL TRIALS IN A META-ANALYSIS (1996)BORROWING STRENGTH FROM EXTER…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Meta-analysis in clinical tri…The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Evaluating Diagnostic Test Accuracy: A Practical Review for Clinical Researchers-Part II. Statistical Methods of Meta-Analysis (2015)A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factor studies (2019)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)A Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis (2008)Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial (2010)Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses (2011)Conceptual and Technical Challenges in Network Meta-analysis (2013)Network meta-analysis: an introduction for clinicians (2016)Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression (2021)The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1995)Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons (2004)Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis (2010)A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis (2014)Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis (2014)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary roc curve: Data‐analytic approaches and some additional considerations (1993)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)Statistical Methods for Examining Heterogeneity and Combining Results from Several Studies in Meta‐Analysis (2001)Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines (2002)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (Chinese edition) (2009)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (2023)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I² index? (2006)Interpreting Indirect Treatment Comparisons and Network Meta-Analysis for Health-Care Decision Making: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 1 (2011)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods (2015)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Positive Psychological Well-Being and Mortality: A Quantitative Review of Prospective Observational Studies (2008)Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses (2008)A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies (2006)Metandi: Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Using Hierarchical Logistic Regression (2009)Conducting proportional meta-analysis in different types of systematic reviews: a guide for synthesisers of evidence (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1986Meta-analysis in clinical trials39,515 cited
  • 2019Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions14,763 cited
  • 2012Consistency and inconsistency in network meta‐analysis: concepts and models for multi‐arm studies2,095 cited
  • 2012Indirect and mixed‐treatment comparison, network, or multiple‐treatments meta‐analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool1,722 cited
  • 2001Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests1,345 cited
  • 1997Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials1,170 cited
  • 2008Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy1,124 cited
  • 2012Consistency and inconsistency in network meta‐analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta‐regression1,114 cited
  • 2007Evaluation of networks of randomized trials1,077 cited
  • 2001Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests851 cited
  • 2015Network Meta-analysis778 cited
  • 1996BORROWING STRENGTH FROM EXTERNAL TRIALS IN A META-ANALYSIS560 cited
  • 2023netmeta : An R Package for Network Meta-Analysis Using Frequentist Methods529 cited
  • 2011Multivariate Random-effects Meta-regression: Updates to Mvmeta399 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2014
A design‐by‐treatment interaction model for network meta‐analysis with random inconsistency effects
307 cited
  • 2016Random effects meta‐analysis: Coverage performance of 95 % confidence and prediction intervals following REML estimation235 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.