Global microscale walkability ratings and rankings: A novel composite indicator for 59 European city centres

Alexandros Bartzokas-Tsiompras · Efthimios Bakogiannis · Alexandros Nikitas

40 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Transport Geography

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Urban Transport and Accessibility Urban Design and Spatial Analysis Urban Green Space and Health

Abstract

Several walkability studies have focused primarily on macro-level environmental factors. Nevertheless, previous research has shown that street-level design can also support walking. In this paper, we present a novel Microscale Walkability Index, ‘MWI’, that measures, ranks, and analyses the pedestrian-friendliness levels of 59 heterogeneous city centres in 26 European countries. We selected 26 case studies from European capitals and 33 city centres from metropolitan areas of regional or national importance and with >500.000 inhabitants. The conceptual framework is based on the Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes tool, while the final scores were synthesised by aggregating three comparative benchmarking dimensions: sidewalk environment (SE), pedestrian crossings (PC), and streetscape level (SL). We used OECD's multivariate statistical analysis concept as well as an empirically aggregated indicator dataset that contained street inventories of city centres, combined with observations from Google Street View of a total of 112.000 segments/crossings and 17 urban design topics. Results showed that the five most pedestrian-friendly city centres are Barcelona, Bilbao, Oslo, Zurich, and Paris, whereas Bucharest, Athens, Sofia, Plovdiv, and Palermo are ranked last. Mann-Whitney tests showed significant differences in average microscale walkability rankings, when cities had higher GDP per capita, a higher proportion of walking/cycling and better sustainability performance. This study paves the way for future spatially dissagregated walkability approaches using multi-level models and recommends greater policy support for improving pedestrian facilities in less developed city centres in Southern/Eastern Europe.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 40 citations exist upstream.

References

2008Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide 2021Introducing the “15-Minute City”: Sustainability, Resilience and Place Identity in Future Post-Pandemic Cities 2005Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form 2018On the Methodological Framework of Composite Indices: A Review of the Issues of Weighting, Aggregation, and Robustness 2009The development of a walkability index: application to the Neighborhood Quality of Life Study 2021Street view imagery in urban analytics and GIS: A review 2006Walkability of local communities: Using geographic information systems to objectively assess relevant environmental attributes 2016Does Compact Development Make People Drive Less?

Cited by

2024Unravelling the Spatial Arrangement of the 15-Minute City: A Comparative Study of Shanghai, Melbourne, and Portland 2024Pedestrian Accessibility Analysis of Sidewalk-Specific Networks: Insights from Three Latin American Central Squares 2024Toward Resilient Urban Design: Pedestrians as an Important Element of City Design 2025Analyzing the typology and livability of 15-minute travel at metro stations in high-density cities: A case study of Singapore

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.