SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Acknowledgments in Scientific Papers
16 references·1 citing·48 second hop
Acknowledgments in Scientific Papers (2023)Acknowledgments in Scientific PapersScopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies (2020)Scopus as a curated, high-qua…Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond (2019)Open science challenges, bene…Dealing with the positive publication bias: Why you should really publish your negative results (2017)Dealing with the positive pub…The rise in co-authorship in the social sciences (1980–2013) (2016)The rise in co-authorship in …Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production (2016)Contributorship and division …Characterization, description, and considerations for the use of funding acknowledgement data in Web of Science (2016)Characterization, description…The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)The Oligopoly of Academic Pub…Multiple Authorship in Scientific Manuscripts: Ethical Challenges, Ghost and Guest/Gift Authorship, and the Cultural/Disciplinary Perspective (2015)Multiple Authorship in Scient…Approaching the “reward triangle”: General analysis of the presence of funding acknowledgments and “peer interactive communication” in scientific publications (2012)Approaching the “reward trian…Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey (2011)Honorary and ghost authorship…The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)The Increasing Dominance of T…Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities (2006)Canadian collaboration networ…Who gets acknowledged: Measuring scientific contributions through automatic acknowledgment indexing (2004)Who gets acknowledged: Measur…A cast of thousands: Coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration in the 20th century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of psychology and philosophy (2003)A cast of thousands: Coauthor…Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? (2001)Hyperauthorship: A postmodern…Modern Evolution of the Experimental Report in Physics: Spectroscopic Articles in Physical Review, 1893-1980 (1984)Modern Evolution of the Exper…The undeclared use of third-party service providers in academic publishing is unethical: an epistemic reflection and scoping review (2024)The undeclared use of third-p…Little Science, Big Science (1963)Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy (2000)The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing (2015)The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative conceptualisation approach (2020)A user-friendly method to merge Scopus and Web of Science data during bibliometric analysis (2021)The strain on scientific publishing (2024)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Market value and patent citations (2005)Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups (2010)Temperature Shocks and Economic Growth: Evidence from the Last Half Century (2012)The Growing Importance of Social Skills in the Labor Market* (2017)Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and the Activity of the Experimental Article in Science (1989)What is research collaboration? (1997)Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing (2001)The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers (2010)International research collaboration: An emerging domain of innovation studies? (2018)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)Scientific collaboration and endorsement: Network analysis of coauthorship and citation networks (2010)Over-optimization of academic publishing metrics: observing Goodhart's Law in action (2019)International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (1990)When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable (1997)Prevalence of Articles With Honorary Authors and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals (1998)Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication (2018)Qualitative Research Methods (2021)The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason (1975)Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (2005)Author-Reviewer Homophily in Peer Review (2018)The Pandemic Penalty: The Gendered Effects of COVID-19 on Scientific Productivity (2021)Flat teams drive scientific innovation (2022)HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known (1998)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)Eight problems with literature reviews and how to fix them (2020)Rodent models of post-traumatic stress disorder: behavioral assessment (2020)Jupyter Notebooks – a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows (2016)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)The past, present and future of Registered Reports (2021)Science and Engineering Indicators (2004)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)Rise of multi-authored papers in economics: Demise of the ‘lone star’ and why? (2017)Interdisciplinary team science and the public: Steps toward a participatory team science. (2018)Creativity and education: A bibliometric mapping of the research literature (1975–2019) (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge3,605 cited
  • 2020Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies2,084 cited
  • 2015The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era1,239 cited
  • 2019Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond605 cited
  • 2017Dealing with the positive publication bias: Why you should really publish your negative results516 cited
  • 2001Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices?499 cited
  • 2011Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey477 cited
  • 2003A cast of thousands: Coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration in the 20th century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of psychology and philosophy298 cited
  • 2016The rise in co-authorship in the social sciences (1980–2013)265 cited
  • 2016Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production264 cited
  • 2006Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities215 cited
  • 1984Modern Evolution of the Experimental Report in Physics: Spectroscopic Articles in Physical Review, 1893-1980152 cited
  • 2004Who gets acknowledged: Measuring scientific contributions through automatic acknowledgment indexing143 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2012Approaching the “reward triangle”: General analysis of the presence of funding acknowledgments and “peer interactive communication” in scientific publications141 cited
  • 2016Characterization, description, and considerations for the use of funding acknowledgement data in Web of Science119 cited
  • 2015Multiple Authorship in Scientific Manuscripts: Ethical Challenges, Ghost and Guest/Gift Authorship, and the Cultural/Disciplinary Perspective117 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024The undeclared use of third-party service providers in academic publishing is unethical: an epistemic reflection and scoping review16 cited