SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Open Science in Italy: Lessons Learned En Route to Opening Scholarship
16 references·0 citing·52 second hop
Open Science in Italy: Lessons Learned En Route to Opening Scholarship (2023)Open Science in Italy: Lessons Learned En…Promoting trust in research and researchers: How open science and research integrity are intertwined (2022)Promoting trust in research a…Reaping the benefits of open science in scholarly communication (2021)Reaping the benefits of open …Purposeful Evaluation of Scholarship in the Open Science Era (2021)Purposeful Evaluation of Scho…Preprints: Their Evolving Role in Science Communication (2021)Preprints: Their Evolving Rol…Is preprint the future of science? A thirty year journey of online preprint services (2021)Is preprint the future of sci…How self-determination of scholars outclasses shrinking public research lab budgets, supporting scientific production: a case study and R&D management implications (2021)How self-determination of sch…Aspiring to greater intellectual humility in science (2021)Aspiring to greater intellect…Publishing scientific articles in the digital era (2020)Publishing scientific article…Predicting the results of evaluation procedures of academics (2019)Predicting the results of eva…The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future (2018)The evaluation of scholarship…Digital open science—Teaching digital tools for reproducible and transparent research (2018)Digital open science—Teaching…Do you speak open science? Resources and tips to learn the language (2017)Do you speak open science? Re…Do you speak open science? Resources and tips to learn the language (2017)Do you speak open science? Re…When will ‘open science’ become simply ‘science’? (2015)When will ‘open science’ beco…Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought (2013)Open Science: One Term, Five …The research-impact cycle1 (2003)The research-impact cycle1Citizen science: a study of people, expertise and sustainable development (1996)Do Open-Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact? (2004)Scientists? collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital (2004)Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas (2016)Academic engagement: A review of the literature 2011-2019 (2020)Transparency in artificial intelligence (2020)Opening up BMJ peer review (1999)Reinventing Discovery (2011)Reinventing discovery: the new era of networked science (2012)Five selfish reasons to work reproducibly (2015)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)Promoting an open research culture (2015)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)The preregistration revolution (2018)Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond (2019)Improving the trustworthiness, usefulness, and ethics of biomedical research through an innovative and comprehensive institutional initiative (2020)Teaching open and reproducible scholarship: a critical review of the evidence base for current pedagogical methods and their outcomes (2023)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion and tenure documents? (2019)Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations (2019)The limitations to our understanding of peer review (2020)Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior (1985)Building Theories from Case Study Research (1989)Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges (2007)Sensor Technology for Opening New Pathways in Diagnosis and Therapeutics of Breast, Lung, Colorectal and Prostate Cancer (2022)Evolutionary Pathways of Ecosystem Literature in Organization and Management Studies (2023)General laws of funding for scientific citations: how citations change in funded and unfunded research between basic and applied sciences (2024)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Reproducibility: A tragedy of errors (2016)Science of science (2018)To Preprint or Not to Preprint: A Global Researcher Survey (2023)How the readability of manuscript before journal submission advantages peer review process: Evidence from biomedical scientific publications (2024)Public understanding of preprints: How audiences make sense of unreviewed research in the news (2024)An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research (2012)Constraints on Generality (COG): A Proposed Addition to All Empirical Papers (2017)Predictors and consequences of intellectual humility (2022)Diversity and representation in infant research: Barriers and bridges toward a globalized science of infant development (2023)Reducing bias, increasing transparency and calibrating confidence with preregistration (2023)The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)Preprint paper platforms in the academic scholarly communication environment (2021)Document analysis of the Foundation for a Smoke-Free World’s scientific outputs and activities: a case study in contemporary tobacco industry agnogenesis (2023)Sneaked references: Fabricated reference metadata distort citation counts (2024)What does research reproducibility mean? (2016)Messing with Merton: The intersection between open science practices and Mertonian values (2022)Contours of a research ethics and integrity perspective on open science (2023)Open Science at the generative AI turn: An exploratory analysis of challenges and opportunities (2024)Citizen-Scholars: Social Media and the Changing Nature of Scholarship (2019)A tale of two 'opens': intersections between Free and Open Source Software and Open Scholarship (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought829 cited
  • 2018The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future358 cited
  • 2021Aspiring to greater intellectual humility in science117 cited
  • 2015When will ‘open science’ become simply ‘science’?90 cited
  • 2018Digital open science—Teaching digital tools for reproducible and transparent research80 cited
  • 2022Promoting trust in research and researchers: How open science and research integrity are intertwined65 cited
  • 2021How self-determination of scholars outclasses shrinking public research lab budgets, supporting scientific production: a case study and R&D management implications47 cited
  • 2017Do you speak open science? Resources and tips to learn the language43 cited
  • 2021Is preprint the future of science? A thirty year journey of online preprint services32 cited
  • 2021Preprints: Their Evolving Role in Science Communication30 cited
  • 2020Publishing scientific articles in the digital era24 cited
  • 2021Reaping the benefits of open science in scholarly communication22 cited
  • 2017Do you speak open science? Resources and tips to learn the language18 cited
  • 2003The research-impact cycle116 cited
  • 2021

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Purposeful Evaluation of Scholarship in the Open Science Era
12 cited
  • 2019Predicting the results of evaluation procedures of academics12 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.