SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Self-Citation Rates Among Neurosurgery Journals and Authors: Unethical or Misunderstood?
16 references·0 citing·47 second hop
Self-Citation Rates Among Neurosurgery Journals and Authors: Unethical or Misunderstood? (2023)Self-Citation Rates Among Neurosurgery Jo…Global trends and performances in diabetic retinopathy studies: A bibliometric analysis (2023)Global trends and performance…The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation (2021)The h-index is no longer an e…The 100,000 most influential scientists rank: the underrepresentation of Brazilian women in academia (2021)The 100,000 most influential …Self-Citation Patterns of Journals Indexed in the Journal Citation Reports (2021)Self-Citation Patterns of Jou…How Many Neurosurgeons Does It Take to Author an Article and What Are the Other Factors That Impact Citations? (2020)How Many Neurosurgeons Does I…Hundreds of extreme self-citing scientists revealed in new database (2019)Hundreds of extreme self-citi…Self-citation rate and impact factor in the field of plastic and reconstructive surgery (2017)Self-citation rate and impact…Bibliometrics: Is your most cited work your best? (2014)Bibliometrics: Is your most c…Brazilian citation scheme outed (2013)Brazilian citation scheme out…Assessing National Institutes of Health funding and scholarly impact in neurological surgery (2013)Assessing National Institutes…Author Self-Citation in the General Medicine Literature (2011)Author Self-Citation in the G…Author self‐citation pattern in science (2009)Author self‐citation pattern …Author self-citation in the diabetes literature (2004)Author self-citation in the d…A bibliometric approach to the role of author self-citations in scientific communication (2004)A bibliometric approach to th…A macro study of self-citation (2003)A macro study of self-citationOn the Heterogeneity and Classification of Author Self‐Citations (1982)On the Heterogeneity and Clas…An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Use of the h index in neurosurgery (2009)Gender Disparities in Scholarly Productivity within Academic Otolaryngology Departments (2012)Impact of mentoring medical students on scholarly productivity (2013)Gender Differences in Successful National Institutes of Health Funding in Ophthalmology (2014)Academic Benchmarks for Otolaryngology Leaders (2015)Cited Documents as Concept Symbols (1978)The Outer circle: women in the scientific community (1992)Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact (2013)Does Interdisciplinary Research Lead to Higher Citation Impact? The Different Effect of Proximal and Distal Interdisciplinarity (2015)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)Which Type of Citation Analysis Generates the Most Accurate Taxonomy of Scientific and Technical Knowledge? (2016)Studies in scientific collaboration Part III. Professionalization and the natural history of modern scientific co-authorship (1979)Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (1980)Does self-citation pay? (2007)Problems of citation analysis: A critical review (1989)A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes (2003)Bibliometric Methods: Pitfalls and Possibilities (2005)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Fortnightly Review: How can impact factors be improved? (1996)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Comparisons of Citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for Articles Published in General Medical Journals (2009)Randomized trials published in higher vs. lower impact journals differ in design, conduct, and analysis (2013)Systematic reviews published in higher impact clinical journals were of higher quality (2014)The 100 most-cited articles in orthodontics: A bibliometric study (2018)Journal Prestige, Publication Bias, and Other Characteristics Associated With Citation of Published Studies in Peer-Reviewed Journals (2002)Self‐citation and self‐reference: Credibility and promotion in academic publication (2003)A scientometric analysis of international LIS journals: Productivity and characteristics (2008)The creative person in science. (2013)Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? (1979)An introduction to informetrics (1992)Expert credibility in climate change (2010)Men Set Their Own Cites High: Gender and Self-citation across Fields and over TimeMen Set Their Own Cites High: Gender and Self-citation across Fields and over Time (2017)A standardized citation metrics author database annotated for scientific field (2019)Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies (2020)Analysis of evolutionary process in intuitionistic fuzzy set theory: A dynamic perspective (2022)Quantitative research assessment: using metrics against gamed metrics (2023)A NEW MEASURE OF RANK CORRELATION (1938)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Bibliometric Analysis for Medical Research (2022)Research Hotspots and Trends of Peripheral Nerve Injuries Based on Web of Science From 2017 to 2021: A Bibliometric Analysis (2022)The h-Index: Understanding its predictors, significance, and criticism (2023)The Use of Bibliometrics for Assessing Research: Possibilities, Limitations and Adverse Effects (2014)Academic Misconduct, Misrepresentation and Gaming: A Reassessment (2018)Scholarly Twitter Metrics (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2003A macro study of self-citation364 cited
  • 2021The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation201 cited
  • 2019Hundreds of extreme self-citing scientists revealed in new database140 cited
  • 2004A bibliometric approach to the role of author self-citations in scientific communication138 cited
  • 2014Bibliometrics: Is your most cited work your best?122 cited
  • 2004Author self-citation in the diabetes literature116 cited
  • 2013Brazilian citation scheme outed115 cited
  • 1982On the Heterogeneity and Classification of Author Self‐Citations98 cited
  • 2011Author Self-Citation in the General Medicine Literature92 cited
  • 2013Assessing National Institutes of Health funding and scholarly impact in neurological surgery60 cited
  • 2021Self-Citation Patterns of Journals Indexed in the Journal Citation Reports37 cited
  • 2023Global trends and performances in diabetic retinopathy studies: A bibliometric analysis33 cited
  • 2021The 100,000 most influential scientists rank: the underrepresentation of Brazilian women in academia24 cited
  • 2017Self-citation rate and impact factor in the field of plastic and reconstructive surgery24 cited
  • 2009Author self‐citation pattern in science

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

22 cited
  • 2020How Many Neurosurgeons Does It Take to Author an Article and What Are the Other Factors That Impact Citations?20 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.