SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Replacing academic journals
8 references·4 citing·42 second hop
Replacing academic journals (2023)Replacing academic journalsCurrent market rates for scholarly publishing services (2021)Current market rates for scho…Current market rates for scholarly publishing services (2021)Current market rates for scho…Article Processing Charge Hyperinflation and Price Insensitivity: An Open Access Sequel to the Serials Crisis (2019)Article Processing Charge Hyp…A proposal for the future of scientific publishing in the life sciences (2019)A proposal for the future of …Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability (2018)Prestigious Science Journals …The Limits of Neoliberalism: Authority, Sovereignty and the Logic of Competition (2017)The Limits of Neoliberalism: …The Limits of Neoliberalism: Authority, Sovereignty and the Logic of Competition (2014)The Limits of Neoliberalism: …The deconstructed journal — a new model for academic publishing (1999)The deconstructed journal — a…Global North-South science inequalities due to language and funding barriers (2026)Global North-South science in…The ethics of erroneous AI-generated scientific figures (2025)The ethics of erroneous AI-ge…Mastodon over Mammon: towards publicly owned scholarly knowledge (2023)Mastodon over Mammon: towards…A Plea to Psychology Professional Societies that Publish Journals: Assess Computational Reproducibility (2023)A Plea to Psychology Professi…The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. (1964)Scholarly Skywriting and the Prepublication Continuum of Scientific Inquiry (1990)Tragic loss or good riddance? The impending demise of traditional scholarly journals (1995)The “Green” and “Gold” Roads to Open Access: The Case for Mixing and Matching (2004)Decoupling the scholarly journal (2012)The Handbook of Journal Publishing (2013)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)The Impact Factor Fallacy (2018)Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing (2019)Citation counts and journal impact factors do not capture some indicators of research quality in the behavioural and brain sciences (2022)Article-Level Metrics and the Evolution of Scientific Impact (2009)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Let’s move beyond the rhetoric: it’s time to change how we judge research (2018)The preregistration revolution (2018)Preprints and Scholarly Communication: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Adoption, Practices, Drivers and Barriers (2019)How to improve scientific peer review: Four schools of thought (2023)Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison (2017)Crossref: The sustainable source of community-owned scholarly metadata (2020)Journal citation reports and the definition of a predatory journal: The case of the Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) (2021)The strain on scientific publishing (2024)Scientific Utopia: I. Opening Scientific Communication (2012)Open access: The true cost of science publishing (2013)The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era (2015)Scientific Publishing in Biomedicine: A Brief History of Scientific Journals (2022)Maximizing Access and Minimizing Barriers to Research in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Open Access and Health Equity (2023)The future of academic publishing (2023)Drawing-to-Learn: A Framework for Using Drawings to Promote Model-Based Reasoning in Biology (2015)AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations (2018)Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence (2023)Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective (1988)Integrative review: what is it? How to do it? (2010)Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)Beauty surveillance: The digital self-monitoring cultures of neoliberalism (2017)What's New with Numbers? Sociological Approaches to the Study of Quantification (2019)Assetization (2020)Requiem for impact factors and high publication charges (2021)The competition fetish in higher education: Shamans, mind snares and consequences (2018)The exhausted futures of neoliberalism: from promissory legitimacy to social anomy (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2014The Limits of Neoliberalism: Authority, Sovereignty and the Logic of Competition787 cited
  • 2017The Limits of Neoliberalism: Authority, Sovereignty and the Logic of Competition253 cited
  • 2018Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability213 cited
  • 2019Article Processing Charge Hyperinflation and Price Insensitivity: An Open Access Sequel to the Serials Crisis176 cited
  • 2019A proposal for the future of scientific publishing in the life sciences114 cited
  • 1999The deconstructed journal — a new model for academic publishing98 cited
  • 2021Current market rates for scholarly publishing services63 cited
  • 2021Current market rates for scholarly publishing services55 cited

Cited by

  • 2026Global North-South science inequalities due to language and funding barriers25 cited
  • 2025The ethics of erroneous AI-generated scientific figures19 cited
  • 2023Mastodon over Mammon: towards publicly owned scholarly knowledge13 cited
  • 2023A Plea to Psychology Professional Societies that Publish Journals: Assess Computational Reproducibility8 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work