SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Determinants of research productivity and efficiency among the Arab world’s accredited business schools
16 references·0 citing·39 second hop
Determinants of research productivity and efficiency among the Arab world’s accredited business schools (2023)Determinants of research productivity and…Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Web of Science (WoS) and Scop…The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)The journal coverage of Web o…Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic (2021)Large-scale comparison of bib…Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies (2020)Scopus as a curated, high-qua…A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers (2020)A tale of two databases: the …A Brief History of Scopus: The World’s Largest Abstract and Citation Database of Scientific Literature (2017)A Brief History of Scopus: Th…Varieties of institutional systems: A contextual taxonomy of understudied countries (2016)Varieties of institutional sy…Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature (2016)Factors affecting number of c…The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)The bibliometric analysis of …Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Man…Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization (2014)Bibliometric Methods in Manag…The Assessment of Science: The Relative Merits of Post-Publication Review, the Impact Factor, and the Number of Citations (2013)The Assessment of Science: Th…Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective (2013)Co-authorship networks and re…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The History and Meaning of th…Legitimating Agencies in the Face of Selection: The Case of AACSB (2005)Legitimating Agencies in the …An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Quantitative Analysis of Culture Using Millions of Digitized Books (2010)Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review (2020)Bibliometric Analysis: The Main Steps (2024)How to design bibliometric research: an overview and a framework proposal (2024)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impact (2001)A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases (2013)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact (2011)A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Medical Big Data Research (2018)A bibliometric analysis of board diversity: Current status, development, and future research directions (2019)Early coauthorship with top scientists predicts success in academic careers (2019)Science and Engineering Indicators (2004)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison (2015)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)Worker and workplace Artificial Intelligence (AI) coexistence: Emerging themes and research agenda (2023)Guidelines for Bibliometric‐Systematic Literature Reviews: 10 steps to combine analysis, synthesis and theory development (2024)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in business and management research: A contemporary overview (2022)Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation (1990)Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review (2003)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines (2021)Advances in Consumer Research (2025)Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice (2022)The Science of Literature Reviews: Searching, Identifying, Selecting, and Synthesising (2023)Artificial intelligence for literature reviews: opportunities and challenges (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2014Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization7,468 cited
  • 2015The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?3,130 cited
  • 2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics2,816 cited
  • 2006The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor2,765 cited
  • 2021Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World2,676 cited
  • 2021The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis2,085 cited
  • 2020Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies2,084 cited
  • 2020A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers1,554 cited
  • 2016Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature912 cited
  • 2021Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic864 cited
  • 2013Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective474 cited
  • 2016Varieties of institutional systems: A contextual taxonomy of understudied countries384 cited
  • 2013The Assessment of Science: The Relative Merits of Post-Publication Review, the Impact Factor, and the Number of Citations

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

295 cited
  • 2017A Brief History of Scopus: The World’s Largest Abstract and Citation Database of Scientific Literature292 cited
  • 2005Legitimating Agencies in the Face of Selection: The Case of AACSB233 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.