SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
An examination of psychometric properties of study quality assessment scales in meta-analysis: Rasch measurement model applied to the firefighter cancer literature
16 references·0 citing·49 second hop
An examination of psychometric properties of study quality assessment scales in meta-analysis: Rasch measurement model applied to the firefighter cancer literature (2023)An examination of psychometric properties…The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)The Handbook of Research Synt…The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015)The methodological quality as…The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (N…Quality assessment of observational studies in a drug-safety systematic review, comparison of two tools: the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and the RTI item bank (2014)Quality assessment of observa…The standards for educational and psychological testing. (2013)The standards for educational…Development of the RTI item bank on risk of bias and precision of observational studies (2011)Development of the RTI item b…On the bias produced by quality scores in meta-analysis, and a hierarchical view of proposed solutions (2001)On the bias produced by quali…Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Assessing the quality of cont…The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)The Hazards of Scoring the Qu…Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses. (1999)Assessing the quality of repo…Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Assessing the quality of repo…Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis (1992)Incorporating variations in t…A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)A method for assessing the qu…Unifactor Latent Trait Models Applied to Multifactor Tests: Results and Implications (1979)Unifactor Latent Trait Models…Studies in Mathematical Psychology. (1964)Studies in Mathematical Psych…Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. (1957)Factors relevant to the valid…Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (1998)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Effects of music interventions on stress-related outcomes: a systematic review and two meta-analyses (2019)Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020)Anxiety, depression, trauma-related, and sleep disorders among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2021)Design of Experiments (1936)Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments (1956)Techniques to Identify Themes (2003)Rankings and Reactivity: How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds (2007)Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research (2007)Communication And Persuasion (2017)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields (2004)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies (2013)Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability (1968)Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores (1969)Construct validity: Construct representation versus nomothetic span. (1983)Effects of Local Item Dependence on the Fit and Equating Performance of the Three-Parameter Logistic Model (1984)The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales—21 (DASS‐21): Further Examination of Dimensions, Scale Reliability, and Correlates (2012)Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives (1999)A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research (2000)Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry (2000)Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences (2000)Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance (2002)The Ability Model of Emotional Intelligence: Principles and Updates (2016)Review papers : The statistical basis of meta-analysis (1993)Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)A meta-analysis of the impact of short-term sleep deprivation on cognitive variables. (2010)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2014The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses17,633 cited
  • 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
  • 2013The standards for educational and psychological testing.6,992 cited
  • 2019The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis4,525 cited
  • 2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials3,309 cited
  • 2015The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review2,079 cited
  • 1999The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis1,981 cited
  • 1981A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial1,349 cited
  • 1957Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings.1,143 cited
  • 1979Unifactor Latent Trait Models Applied to Multifactor Tests: Results and Implications934 cited
  • 1992Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis640 cited
  • 2014Quality assessment of observational studies in a drug-safety systematic review, comparison of two tools: the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and the RTI item bank442 cited
  • 1999Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses.368 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1964
Studies in Mathematical Psychology.
364 cited
  • 2001On the bias produced by quality scores in meta-analysis, and a hierarchical view of proposed solutions359 cited
  • 2011Development of the RTI item bank on risk of bias and precision of observational studies264 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.