SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Rapid literature review: definition and methodology
14 references·9 citing·44 second hop
Rapid literature review: definition and methodology (2023)Rapid literature review: definition and m…Rapid reviews and the methodological rigor of evidence synthesis: a JBI position statement (2022)Rapid reviews and the methodo…Paper 3: Selecting rapid review methods for complex questions related to health policy and system issues (2021)Paper 3: Selecting rapid revi…Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews (2020)Cochrane Rapid Reviews Method…Delphi consensus reached to produce a decision tool for SelecTing Approaches for Rapid Reviews (STARR) (2019)Delphi consensus reached to p…Twelve tips for undertaking a focused systematic review in medical education (2018)Twelve tips for undertaking a…Redefining rapid reviews: a flexible framework for restricted systematic reviews (2018)Redefining rapid reviews: a f…Rapid reviews may produce different results to systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study (2018)Rapid reviews may produce dif…The Use of Rapid Review Methods for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2017)The Use of Rapid Review Metho…What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: a rapid review (2016)What are the best methodologi…The use of rapid review methods in health technology assessments: 3 case studies (2016)The use of rapid review metho…Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group to play a leading role in guiding the production of informed high-quality, timely research evidence syntheses (2016)Cochrane Rapid Reviews Method…An international survey and modified Delphi approach revealed numerous rapid review methods (2015)An international survey and m…Combining Campbell Standards and the Realist Evaluation Approach (2008)Combining Campbell Standards …Number of published systematic reviews and global burden of disease: database analysis (2003)Number of published systemati…Investigating Accessibility Barriers in Software Development Tools Through the Blind People's Perspective (2026)Investigating Accessibility B…Scoping review of evidence synthesis: Concepts, types and methods (2025)Scoping review of evidence sy…Challenges and opportunities in reforming the planning system for England: a rapid review of literature and lessons for the future of planning for health (2025)Challenges and opportunities …Adult Mental Health, Major Conditions and Social Prescribing: A Rapid Review (2025)Adult Mental Health, Major Co…A Systematic Review of Asset Integrity and Process Safety Management Sustainability for Onshore Petrochemical Installations (2025)A Systematic Review of Asset …Workforce agility: a systematic literature review and research agenda (2024)Workforce agility: a systemat…Social, cultural and political conditions for advancing health equity: examples from eight country case studies (2011–2021) (2024)Social, cultural and politica…Bridging the Gap Between Time Management Research and Task Management App Design: A Study on the Integration of Planning Fallacy Mitigation Strategies (2024)Bridging the Gap Between Time…Introducing SoNHR–Reporting guidelines for Social Networks In Health Research (2023)Introducing SoNHR–Reporting g…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how (2017)Systematic Reviews: Critical Links in the Great Chain of Evidence (1997)Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences (1989)The Uses of Argument (2003)Evidence-based Policy (2006)Clarifying differences between review designs and methods (2012)Narrative approaches to systematic review and synthesis of evidence for international development policy and practice (2012)Gray literature: An important resource in systematic reviews (2017)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach (2012)A scoping review of rapid review methods (2015)Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: a methodological systematic review (2019)Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Meta-Analytic Methodology for Basic Research: A Practical Guide (2019)International estimates of intended uptake and refusal of COVID-19 vaccines: A rapid systematic review and meta-analysis of large nationally representative samples (2021)RAPID VERSUS FULL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS: VALIDITY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE? (2008)Defining Rapid Reviews: a systematic scoping review and thematic analysis of definitions and defining characteristics of rapid reviews (2020)Summarising good practice guidelines for data extraction for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (2021)Paper 2: Performing rapid reviews (2022)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Can ChatGPT Write a Good Boolean Query for Systematic Review Literature Search? (2023)Updated recommendations for the Cochrane rapid review methods guidance for rapid reviews of effectiveness (2024)Behavioral Study of obedience. (1963)Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique (2000)Using thematic analysis in psychology (2006)Changes in Youth Mental Health, Psychological Wellbeing, and Substance Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Rapid Review (2022)Rapid Reviews Methods Series: Involving patient and public partners, healthcare providers and policymakers as knowledge users (2023)Mail and internet surveys : the tailored design method (2007)PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement (2016)Confidence and Receptivity for COVID-19 Vaccines: A Rapid Systematic Review (2020)A rapid review of the impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of healthcare workers: implications for supporting psychological well-being (2021)Mental Health of Children and Adolescents Amidst COVID-19 and Past Pandemics: A Rapid Systematic Review (2021)Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data (2015)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Rapid review method series: interim guidance for the reporting of rapid reviews (2024)A scoping review and expert consensus on digital determinants of health (2025)Digital public health interventions for the promotion of mental well-being and health behaviors among university students: a rapid review (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2020Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews1,164 cited
  • 2016What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: a rapid review415 cited
  • 2018Redefining rapid reviews: a flexible framework for restricted systematic reviews143 cited
  • 2015An international survey and modified Delphi approach revealed numerous rapid review methods130 cited
  • 2003Number of published systematic reviews and global burden of disease: database analysis112 cited
  • 2008Combining Campbell Standards and the Realist Evaluation Approach98 cited
  • 2018Rapid reviews may produce different results to systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study95 cited
  • 2022Rapid reviews and the methodological rigor of evidence synthesis: a JBI position statement81 cited
  • 2019Delphi consensus reached to produce a decision tool for SelecTing Approaches for Rapid Reviews (STARR)72 cited
  • 2016Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group to play a leading role in guiding the production of informed high-quality, timely research evidence syntheses66 cited
  • 2017The Use of Rapid Review Methods for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force40 cited
  • 2016The use of rapid review methods in health technology assessments: 3 case studies38 cited
  • 2018Twelve tips for undertaking a focused systematic review in medical education

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

24 cited
  • 2021Paper 3: Selecting rapid review methods for complex questions related to health policy and system issues18 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024Workforce agility: a systematic literature review and research agenda36 cited
    • 2023Introducing SoNHR–Reporting guidelines for Social Networks In Health Research13 cited
    • 2024Bridging the Gap Between Time Management Research and Task Management App Design: A Study on the Integration of Planning Fallacy Mitigation Strategies12 cited
    • 2024Social, cultural and political conditions for advancing health equity: examples from eight country case studies (2011–2021)11 cited
    • 2025Scoping review of evidence synthesis: Concepts, types and methods10 cited
    • 2025A Systematic Review of Asset Integrity and Process Safety Management Sustainability for Onshore Petrochemical Installations9 cited
    • 2025Adult Mental Health, Major Conditions and Social Prescribing: A Rapid Review4 cited
    • 2025Challenges and opportunities in reforming the planning system for England: a rapid review of literature and lessons for the future of planning for health4 cited
    • 2026Investigating Accessibility Barriers in Software Development Tools Through the Blind People's Perspective2 cited