References

• 2019Tools used to assess the quality of peer review reports: a methodological systematic review111 cited
• 2020The acceptability of using a lottery to allocate research funding: a survey of applicants68 cited
• 2023Science and Public Policy68 cited
• 2022What works for peer review and decision-making in research funding: a realist synthesis53 cited
• 2018Peer review of health research funding proposals: A systematic map and systematic review of innovations for effectiveness and efficiency42 cited
• 2015A retrospective analysis of the effect of discussion in teleconference and face-to-face scientific peer-review panels31 cited
• 2021A retrospective analysis of the peer review of more than 75,000 Marie Curie proposals between 2007 and 201826 cited
• 2020Grant reviewer perceptions of the quality, effectiveness, and influence of panel discussion18 cited
• 2011European Peer Review Guide: Integrating Policies and Practices into Coherent Procedures17 cited
• 2018What do we know about grant peer review in the health sciences? An updated review of the literature and six case studies14 cited
• 2020What makes an effective grants peer reviewer? An exploratory study of the necessary skills13 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.