SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Experiences of nurses and midwives with disabilities: A scoping review
16 references·0 citing·31 second hop
Experiences of nurses and midwives with disabilities: A scoping review (2023)Experiences of nurses and midwives with d…Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) (2022)Convention on the Rights of P…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2020)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis (2020)JBI Manual for Evidence Synth…Chapter 11: Scoping reviews (2020)Chapter 11: Scoping reviewsInductive Content Analysis (2019)Inductive Content AnalysisThe Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers (2018)The Mixed Methods Appraisal T…Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Systematic review or scoping …PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)PRISMA Extension for Scoping …Disability identity development: A systematic review of the literature. (2017)Disability identity developme…‘But I can do the job’: examining disability employment practice through human rights complaint cases (2016)‘But I can do the job’: exami…Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting (2014)Scoping reviews: time for cla…Critical appraisal tools (2014)Critical appraisal toolsA scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (2014)A scoping review of scoping r…Perspectives on Disability Disclosure: The Importance of Employer Practices and Workplace Climate (2013)Perspectives on Disability Di…Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework (2013)Enhancing the scoping study m…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: towards a me…Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews (2016)The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines (2019)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)Understanding scoping reviews (2016)Embodied Conversational Agents in Clinical Psychology: A Scoping Review (2017)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews (2022)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis (2022)Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement (2022)What is an evidence map? A systematic review of published evidence maps and their definitions, methods, and products (2016)Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application (2021)Exploring the Impact of COVID-19 on Mental Health Outcomes in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review (2020)A rapid review of the impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of healthcare workers: implications for supporting psychological well-being (2021)Quality assessment with diverse studies (QuADS): an appraisal tool for methodological and reporting quality in systematic reviews of mixed- or multi-method studies (2021)Defining Rapid Reviews: a systematic scoping review and thematic analysis of definitions and defining characteristics of rapid reviews (2020)Understanding Eco-anxiety: A Systematic Scoping Review of Current Literature and Identified Knowledge Gaps (2021)How to properly use the PRISMA Statement (2021)Strategies to improve response rates to web surveys: A literature review (2021)Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Reports (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2018PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation43,318 cited
  • 2005Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework36,603 cited
  • 2018Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach11,351 cited
  • 2020The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews5,174 cited
  • 2018The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers4,688 cited
  • 2020JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis4,162 cited
  • 2014A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency3,074 cited
  • 2014Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting2,780 cited
  • 2020Chapter 11: Scoping reviews2,536 cited
  • 2013Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework1,889 cited
  • 2022Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD)775 cited
  • 2014Critical appraisal tools417 cited
  • 2019Inductive Content Analysis392 cited
  • 2013Perspectives on Disability Disclosure: The Importance of Employer Practices and Workplace Climate262 cited
  • 2017

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Disability identity development: A systematic review of the literature.
256 cited
  • 2016‘But I can do the job’: examining disability employment practice through human rights complaint cases86 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.